Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: SECOND REPLY TO HKK@N
Message-ID: <9510081052.0FAC700@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 95 10:52:54 -0700
Lines: 38


milne@crl.com (Andrew Milne)

>Mike O'Connor (lepton@panix.com) wrote:
>: I thought that the documents were registered in "masked" form, where they
>: take some paper with holes in it, put it on top of the originals, and make
>: a copy of that, so you end up with a copy with only some of the words
>: showing.
>
>: The reason the copyright office allows masking is so that an unpublished
>: paper can still be registered for copyright, but the masked copy has
>: enough showing so that it can be used to identify an infringing copy.

OSA PR:
>     A friend of mine has seen copies of some masked docs which were
>filed by the Church in the Denver case.  There are a lot of words and
>letters visible.  He was amazed at how diagonal lines across a page can
>show a lot of text but at the same time you can't figure out what the
>text says.  It's not a blank page with a couple of words visible.  It's
>a lot of letters all over the page.  If you've ever seen one of these
>marked pages, you'd understand that it is very possible to use the
>masked version to verify the authenticity of a document.
 
    You f*cking liar!
    
    I have those masked documents and there is absolutely no way 
    to match the masked text with other text.
    
    Go back to poodleboy for your daily dose of his screaming and
    spit. 
    
    A-hole.
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"