Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: SECOND REPLY TO HKK@N
Message-ID: <9510090933.0DFSH00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 95 09:33:57 -0700
Lines: 66


milne@crl.com (Andrew Milne)

>Judge Whyte specifically found that the copyrights were valid and
>rejected Erlich's challenge to them.

    Nope.  This was a *preliminary* finding as it related only to
    the limited motions in front of Judge Whyte.  It was not based 
    on full arguments to the court at all.

>This has never been an issue.

    Of course it has, and still is.

>Erlich
>only tried to make it one because he didn't have a coherent defense on
>the point of copyright infringement.
                                   
    You haven't even begun to see the arguments.  You are going 
    to know what it is to experience a sh*t-storm.  Even Judge 
    Whyte did research and came up with good arguments for my 
    case.  He found that the Manual of Justice (that nasty 
    little piece of El Ron Dropping) is in public domain, didn't 
    he?

    This week MoFo produced a strong filing for Judge Whyte which
    requested that the scienos be held in contempt of court for 
    failing to return all my personal property illegally seized in 
    the (now vacated) unconstitutional raid in February.  If I 
    get around to it, I'll post some of the lovely language.

    The scienos have filed requesting an impoundment of all the
    materials they shouldn't have ever taken from me during the
    raid that shouldn't have ever happened.  They base this
    filing on my earlier posted intention to do fair use critique
    of all the materials, once I get them back.

    Another hearing (or ruling) will be forthcoming November 3.

>As for Mayo, Judge Mariana Pfaelzer summed him up when she issued a
>preliminary injunction against him and described him as "not a credible
>witness."  This is a polite way for a judge to call somebody a liar. What
>she found not credible was Mayo's claim that he had "remembered" the
>unpublished scriptures when in fact he had received copies stolen from
>the thieves in Denmark.

    Who f*cking cares, *sshole?

    He won the case and walked away with half ownership in the NOTs
    material (that I'm being sued for infringing), didn't he?

>The so-called "OT 8 doc" was fabricated as a malicious means of trying to
>drive a wedge between the Church and its Christian friends. It singularly
>failed to do that. The OT materials have never left the Church and nobody
>outside the Church could know what is in them.

    But it is what Phatso had said lots of other places.  I'm
    gonna prove it to the wogs.

    Count on that.

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"