Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: AYTCH IN TROUBLE?
Message-ID: <9510090933.0DFSJ00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 95 09:33:57 -0700
Lines: 83


                 * the best of Dennis Erlich *

              +---------------------------------+

Sponsored by:
milne@crl.com (Andrew Milne) OSA PR I/C:

Me:
>: impounded because I allegedly have admitted that I intend to
>: violated Judge Whyte's order and am working in collusion with a
>: criminal conspiracy to violate their right to defraud the public.
>
>: Of course this is a toad'l bullsh*t.
                                        
Milne:
>     It appears that Erlich either didn't understand the Church's
>motion or the Judge's order because his characterization of them was
>different than the actual documents.
      
    Woof!

>     The Church filed a motion for impoundment of Erlich's documents on
>October 2, 1995.  The Church asked to have the documents seized
>from Erlich's home turned into the Court for safekeeping.  The motion
>attached two postings from late September 1995.  One was from Erlich and
>one was from Pim van Meurs.  Perhaps Erlich has a short memory because
>he claims not to have posted this type of statement.
         
    Go f*ck yourself in your bleeding *sshole, you lying scumbag.

>     Erlich posted this statement on September 27, 1995, "As soon as the
>scienos return my research to me, I will commence a fair use posting of
>all the materials I am being sued for having posted in the first place.
>This thread I will begin, Oat Tea - Fair Use, will systematically
>explain and criticize every paragraph and sentence, point by point, that
>El Rotundo makes.  I will review all of the material on both Exhibit B
>and A of the suit.  So get ready for fireworks."
                                                                 
    And see, you never disappoint my low expectations of you.

>     Pim posted this statement on September 26, 1995, "Sounds as if the
>judge handed the victory to the ARS.  It is good to hear that 'fair
>use' postings can resume again.  Who knows, if all of us quote a part
>of the OT in order, we can post the whole thing in instalments, with
>appropriate comments, references etc of course."
                                                             
    This has something to do with me?  I am secretly in control
    of Pim?  Cool.

>     Erlich has posted this type of statement in the past which was not
>included in the motion for impoundment.

    Because it would make you robots look even loonier to Judge
    Whyte than you already do.

>Erlich either has a short memory
>or doesn't pay attention to his own statements.  On March 7, 1995, Erlich
>stated in response to someone who was asking to see the copyrighted
>materials, "Give me a couple of weeks, til this is over.  Then I'll be
>happy to post it again."
                              
    After Judge Whyte rules that I can.

>     On February 21, 1995, Erlich posted, "All you wackos have my
>blessing and when it's time to make my decision to place scn into
>public domain, I gwoin do it!"
                                       
    When I'm elected king.

>     On December 31, 1994, Erlich stated that he was going to continue
>to post Church material.  "But that choice will be MINE to make!  No
>local government or court in the US has the power to tell me otherwise."
 
    How to preach in my ministry.
    
    Now FOAD, Milne.  Like a good little insect.
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"