Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: SECOND REPLY TO HKK@N
Message-ID: <9510111235.0HP3701@support.com>
References: <199510110725.AAA07321@netcom15.netcom.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 12:35:50 -0700
Lines: 36


margali@netcom.com (Deird'Re M. Brooks)

Milne:
>     A friend of mine has seen copies of some masked docs which were
>filed by the Church in the Denver case.  There are a lot of words and
>letters visible.  He was amazed at how diagonal lines across a page can
>show a lot of text but at the same time you can't figure out what the
>text says.  It's not a blank page with a couple of words visible.  It's
>a lot of letters all over the page.  If you've ever seen one of these
>marked pages, you'd understand that it is very possible to use the
>masked version to verify the authenticity of a document.
>     It's a standard procedure used by the Copyright Office.
      
Dee:
>This last sentence makes me want to contact the copyright office and find
>out if this is, indeed, the case.
    
    The scienos got away with it.

>I don't believe Andrew *changed* his description so much as refined it.
>Although, Dennis says he saw the documents...perhaps he could shed some
>light on the subject?
                                 
    What's to say?  I have copies of the stuff and there's no way
    one could read or compare it word for word except with the 
    unmasked, identical document.  Any other printing of it would
    be impossible to compare.

>M. Kali, SP1
 
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"