Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: MORE LIES YOUR DENNIS TOL
Message-ID: <9510212146.0ULDH01@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 95 21:46:39 -0700
Lines: 99


an271524@anon.penet.fi (z. q. bOSWORTH-fIELD)

d>                            at least when I was at an outer
>  (public) org, like LA Org.  A noticible percentage of the
>  large breasted women were toppless/nude dancers.

A.J. Danzig:
*> A baldfaced lie.

   Hey!  Lookie here who crawled out from under her rock.  The 
   person who never met me but knows all about me from the 
   1960's.

>  How about some names, Dennis?

   You want me to name names?  That's rich.  

>  But remember, I was there, too.

   So you say.  I don't know you from Adam.

>  I knew a lot about the public and a lot about the staff, day
>  and foundation, certainly a lot more than you would have known from the
>  little hell-hole you created and ruled like a tyrant in the basement.

   Oow.  Did I ever terrorize you?

>  Further, I am still in contact with at least 5 former LA Org staff from
>  that time, as well as many members of the field, so
>  remember all that California case law about slander and libel before you go
>  defaming others.  In fact, a person who was a "large breasted woman" at LA
>  org while you were there might already have a decent case against you,
>  given that the class size ("large breasted women") is probably pretty
>  small (NPI).  I suggest any such persons consider suing Dennis for
>  damages. Of course, he probably has a negative net worth (I speak in
>  financial terms here, thus the probably).

   Drop dead real soon, slimeball.

d> There were one or two hookers, too.
>
*> And who would they be Dennis?  C'mon, let's hear some names!

   I have nothing against topless dancers or hookers.  This was
   back in the late sixties and early seventies.  Just like I
   don't remember you, I don't remember their names.

>  You have
>  nothing to fear *if* (a very large if) you are telling the truth.  Truth
>  is an absolute defense against libel.  But we both know you are lying, so
>  now we will all get to hear your best imitation of Bill Clinton (waffle).

   Does Clinton ever tell you to FOAD?

k> Tell that being a hooker is some sort of out-ethics condition in
>  Scientology?
>
*> Yes it is, in fact you would probably be expelled.
>
k> Let me guess:  As long as you're doing it to pay for auditing...
>
d> You goddit.
>
*> No way.  Out ethics is out ethics. A hooker in L.A. would be, by
>  definition, ineligible for COS services, including auditing.

   Things got a lot tighter in the seventies.  This was true back
   in the late 60's.  Those that hooked for money, and I knew at 
   least 2 at LA Org (only one in the biblical sense), didn't 
   make it widly known.

>  Of course, as a former cramming officer, Dennis knows this, but he
>  prefers to lie.

   F*ck you.

>  I would guess that every former Scientologist who
>  posts here knows it is a lie as well, but most made the decision long ago
>  that their "cause" is more important than veracity, so they won't
>  respond, or they will lie too.  Frankly, I have more respect for
>  someone like Dennis, who, at least at some level, knows he's lying. More
>  pathetic are the others who will not call him on his lies, feeling that
>  somehow lets them off the moral hook; actually, they are even bigger
>  liars, because they are lying to themselves.

   You're babbling.

*> Most pathetic of all are the bigots here at ars who will parrot these
>  lies and accept them as gospel because it feeds their bigotry.

   Crawl back under your rock, Danzig.  You're sounding just 
   like Koreen.
   
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"