Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: MORE LIES YOUR DENNIS
Message-ID: <9511012202.0UYUV02@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 95 22:02:39 -0800
Lines: 75


wolftrip <wolftrip@micron.net>

Me:
> >    I've been posting to ars since July 94.  If anyone thinks I've
> >    lied about something, they should quote my statement (not like
> >    Woof with the "majority of big-breasted women" misattribution
> >    or generally questioning my sincerity) and produce credible
> >    evidence of the falsehood.
Woof:
> >What? You mean you *didn't* say that?
Me:
>    No, *sshole.  You did.  I said there were some.  You made it
>    a "large majority."  You wanna twist my words?
Woof:
>Nope. It was attributed to you in a thread last week,

    By you.  Sweet Jesus!  You *are* lame.

> >"tortures of the damned"? C'mon Erlich, weren't you i/c of the Hard
> >TR's course at LA Org?
>    Never was.  So f*ck you again, you anonymous piece of pigsh*t.
>Could have sworn that was you - beard, heavy eyebrows, dark hair..
>    Liar.
>
>    You came back to the newsgroup calling me a liar.  Now you say
>    you're a lover not a fighter?  You're talkin' outta too many
>    sides of your *ss.
>
>I did no such thing. I simply questioned your statements and your
>intentions. This is the forum for that.

    You challanged my honesty and my motives, your allegations
    proved empty and the forthright thing for you now to do is
    apologize.

>    I say you need to apologize for your allegations.  Each and
>    every specific one of them.  You ain't got the balls to admit you
>    came on as mister macho gonna criticize a man making a stand.
>    And you were full'o sh*t.
>
>Say what you will. The last week has produced data re: USGO/Manson that
>I have never heard before (from a potent source) in another thread.

    Old Tumor yanked your chain, Twit.

>I
>have corrected my statements where it was accurately pointed out and I
>have acknowledged the value of your current situation. That you demand
>an apology is meaningless.

    Suit yourself.

>    Where do you get off?  Are you anything but empty words?  Do you
>    have more than bark, little Woof?  Not so's I'd notice.
>
>You need to pay closer attention then.

    That's the problem.  I need a microscope to find substance in
    what you write.

>    Go back to deluding your family into thinking your just
>    "offlines for a while".  That's more suitable to your level of
>    courage.
>I'd say that what's at stake here is more than whether or not another
>individual measures up to your personal fixation on courage.

    Not for me.  You take the coward's approach and sitting on
    the fence for so long has cost you your balls.

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"