Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: CHARLES MANSON, SCIEN
Message-ID: <9511021815.0PNHX02@support.com>
References: <modemacDHDyK0.Kx4@netcom.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 95 18:15:37 -0800
Lines: 77


referen@ibm.net (Diane Richardson)

>dennis.l.erlich@support.com wrote:
>> smokesig@ix.netcom.com (Neal Hamel)
>> dwtripp@aol.com (DWTripp) wrote:
>> >:I was on ASHO staff at the time. I did hold a tech post. My knowledge
>> >:regarding GO actions in the wake of Manson's arrest came from my
>> >:attendence at regular Friday night poker games where the presence of
>> >:Henning Heldt, Martin Greenberg  and other GO people was consistent. Yes,
>> >:they did talk shop. The "claim" made at the time (I believe it was Martin)
>> >:was that LA Org records had shown that Manson had possibly done a
>> >:Communications Course and bought some books. No refernce was ever made
>> >:regarding any purge of records and if such was done, it was likely
>> >:initiated by LA Org Execs. Possibly even Erlich.
>>
>> Neal:
>> >I used to occasionally attend those games also. Those games
>> >took place long after the evidence of Manson was expunged
>> >from the LA Org. Bob Thomas (DGUS) had it done. And no,
>> >Dennis had nothing to do with inititiating it.  He was just
>> >new on staff when it was done.
>>
>>    Thank you, Neal.
>>
>> >-Neal H.
>>
>>    FOAD, Woofman.

Woof:
>Okay, so you didn't do it.
     
Diane:
>Why did you suggest that Dennis might have, Wolf?
>
>You bullbait with offensive language,I bullbait differently.
>You expect less?
>
>The question that comes to my mind is WHY, Wolf?  Why
>do you WANT to bullbait Dennis?  Since your recent
>reappearance, you have dedicated yourself to
>questioning Dennis Erlich's credibility and motives at
>every opportunity.   What did he do to you that warrants
>such enmity after more than 20 years?
>
>Another poster has already
>pointed out to me that the two-dimensional literalness of many
>ars posters causes some of my comments to be taken more seriously
>than intended.
>
>Perhaps the answer is for you to adapt your style to the
>prevailing culture, rather than expecting others to adjust
>themselves to yours.  You demand accuracy of others, but
>bemoan the fact that others ask accuracy from you.
>
>We did establish one thing though, you were an FNG
>back then and unlikely to have known too much.
>
>You claim you knew Dennis back then, but now you're stating
>that you've just learned what his status was?  This doesn't
>make sense, Wolf.  Exactly how well did you know Dennis?
      
    Not at all.  He's never met me.  He (like thousands of other 
    scienos) knew *of* me.  Next he's gonna demand my autograph 
    just like AJ Danzig did.
    
    Not gonna give it to him.
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"


>Diane Richardson
>referen@ibm.net
>