Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: KIM BAKER AND FACT
Message-ID: <9511191721.0OE9U01@support.com>
References: <48ghq4$4em@club.pelican.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 95 17:21:58 -0800
Lines: 84


An Eye-talian scieno challanges:

>ARE YOU SURE THAT EVERYTHING YOU ARE WRITING  IN THI NEWSGROUP
>IS TRUTH?

    Yes.

>IS IT ONLY SQUIRREL?

    No.

>WICH KIND OF RAPPORT HAVE YOU WITH THE CURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY?

    The kind where Hubbard assigned me personally to the post of
    Chief Cramming Officer, Flag.

>i'M WAITING YOUR REPLY.

    Your Tone 40 was so stong that I had to respond.

>THANK YOU

    You're welcome.

>[NAME DELETED]
>CHURCH OF SCN STAFF MEMBER
>ITALY.CATANIA

    She enclosed this.  I assume her questioning was a response
    to my Post.

>Subject: KIM BAKER AND FACT
>Date: Thu, 16 Nov 95 19:52:22 -0800
>Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
>Message-ID: <9511161952.0RX1U03@support.com>
>References: <48dj36$3ah@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
>
>
>
> * CARBON COPY:
> * Original was to RNEWMAN@CYBERCOM.NET in 3:INTERNETMAIL on the SUPPORT BBS.
>
>                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>rnewman@cybercom.net (Ron Newman)
>
>>She wasn't converted.  She was browbeaten and harassed and
>>coerced into signing a false statement that she did not write
>>and maybe even did not read.
>
>Me:
>    Are these excuses she's making for herself or are you
>    supplying them for her?
>
>Ron:
>The latter :-)   (but I'm saying this stuff on the Net,
>not to her)
>    
>    You think she doesn't read your posts?  Or that OSA doesn't?
>
>    She's got my address.  I've still got the five beautiful
>    postcards she sent me from Capetown over the last year up
>    on my wall.  I'm still willing to chat.
>
>I've got two of those myself, plus a picture of her and several
>of her co-workers.  I'll try to pass your message along at
>an appropriate time, but right now she seems to want to
>step back and stop communicating with most of the a.r.s. regulars.
>                                                                
>    You got me wrong.  I'm not askin to talk to her.  I would 
>    find it most unpleasant.
>
>I'm just going to listen right now, not try to convince her
>of anything.  (Haven't enough people done that
>to her already?)
> 
>    It's she who's done the convincin' of most people.  Me 
>    especially.
     
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"