Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: LA ORG WOMEN
Message-ID: <9511211811.0PK5I02@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 95 18:11:39 -0800
Lines: 79


wolftrip <wolftrip@micron.net>

>Ever wonder why ARS is so full of attacks, flames and suspicions of secret
>agent OSA types? In the post below the beloved Mr. Erlich attributes
>two statements made by RA to me. These people are having a
>conversation with their own imaginations.

> Woof:
> >No apologies needed. This comment, along with Diane's is indicative of
> >how some on ARS view the world. I suppose there are many, such as
>yourselves,
> >who cynically view humans as mere slaves to the dollar, assets to be
> >acquired and cast aside at the whim of the evil corporate overlords. I will
> >state, for the record, that I have never been, nor will I ever be
> >"acquired" by anyone, of any stripe.
>
>     A "cut a deal" kinda guy.
>
>[actually posted by RA]

    Right.  I misattributed it to you.  Very sorry.  Thanks for 
    catching it.

> >It's how CoS sees things, so of necessity we must deal with that view.  It
> >would be utter folly to refuse to recognize that's how they work.  That
> >doesn't mean that I or any other critic approves of or practices it.
>
>     Don't sprain your brin switching positions on us.  First you
>     hold up as you idols the Masters of Disaster Fleshback
>     Triplets and then you say you don't approve of greed?
>
>     Those dots don't connect, Woof.

    I retract the above.

>[actually posted by RA]
> >Your
> >statement has to be taken in the context of who we're dealing with.  This
> >is the same organization that trains people to harrass, coerce, lie,
> >perform covert actions.
>
>     Tell us what you know about that.

    This was part of the same accidental mis-attribution.

> Rogue:
> >> Spot on.  You & I pretty clearly don't see eye to eye on a number of
> >> issues, including Mr. Tripp. :) But that doesn't stop me from seeing that
> >> your research is second to none, and appreciating your keen eye for detail
> >> in peoples' statements.  I greatly value what you contribute here.
>
> Woof:
> >I'd have to disagree here RA, Diane's much vaunted research is purely
> >restricted to maintaining her bias. I have posted here on numerous
> >occassions my exact status and intentions. That she failed to archive
> >that is testimony to her opinion, not any skill.
>
>     And you have contradicted yourself, as above.

    I retract this sentence as incorrect.

>     You are trying to sell the losing argument that the cult
>     isn't a religion.  Even though it is true, it could never be
>     proven.  No.  We must bring the religion, kicking and
>     screaming if necessary, *to* the law and make them obey it.

    No answer to this?

>     Yea, your vision of the ideal future for the cult.  Tell us,
>     O Yapping One.

    Or this?

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"