Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: Tom's Follies Message-ID: <9512060751.0B15200@support.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Wed, 06 Dec 95 07:51:09 -0800 Lines: 105 av282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Martin G. V. Hunt) > : What is clear now is that the cult has taken this up to discredit Tom > : and punish him for not shutting off Dennis's account after he exposed them > : on ars; they are vindictive and spiteful, and not to be trusted. The > : clincher would be proof of Linda's involvement with Scientology *before* > : the blood incident; that would really wrap this case up. Tom: > Martin, I sorry the story doesn't add up to you, but I am just reporting > what happened. The first thing she said when I found her sitting on the > toilet in the bathroom with about a pint of blood on the floor in front > of her was: "Tom, we have got to stop having rough sex like this." Martin: >She sounds like one strange bitch; what a thing to say! Perhaps she's >schizophrenic? Doesn't the cult make use of their "PTS type III's" and >illegal PC's like this sometimes? Yes of course. Look at how they've used Jack Farmer and Peckerwoody. > Of course, I was fully clothed, with my shoes on, being a gentleman, > because previous to this, she was an IRS Criminal Investigation Division > agent in my mind. She impersonated one, and dropped names that are only > know previously in confidential files at IRS CID, or to a former Federal > Grand Jury. Woolard was engaging in psychological terrorism, in my > opinion. Or, perhaps she thought by mentioning this bizarre nothion, I > might believe it happened. > >Yeah; Tone-40 cult bullshit might explain it. I wish Linda would post here >on ars and either defend herself, or admit her cult affiliations, if any. >But we do have one bit of evidence, don't we? She *told* you she was a >Scientologist, correct? > > I was shocked, and went to call for help. She came out of the bathroom > and came to me saying this: "I am a representative of the Church of > Scientology, and I think you should do as attorney Thomas Small has said > you should do--disconnect Dennis Erlich from the Internet." > >Hmmm. > > She immediately returned to the bathroom. > > Then she came out undressed, saying: "I have been sent on a mission, and > I have been instructed to put some blood in your bed." She said this > courteously, with a smile. As she turned to lay down on the bed, I saw the > sausage of blood nestled in her crotch. She wiggled her butt in the bed, > got up, looked at the stain on the sheets to see if she liked the stain, and > returned to the bathroom. She did this with no interefrence from me. > >Jesus; she's one strage bitch, if we are to believe your side of events. >I, for one, would far rather believe in someone who at least posts to ars, >has defended my friend Dennis Erlich, and seems honest and sincere; I would >take your word over Linda's, most likely, if she were here...but she isn't, >and we have no idea what she would say. > > Martin, I am not going to say anything that might be more believable to > you or anyone else: This _is_ what happened. I am not here to explain > Woolard's actions, I am here to report what they were. > >I understand. > > Subsequent to this incident, I was not unconvinced that she was not a > freezoner trying to set-up Scientology. I even considered that maybe she > was telling the truth--that she was an IRS Agent--perhaps trying to set > Scientology up. If Ingram is half an investigator, he would have found > out that I have the reputation of being very honest. I even paid back my > government gauranteed student loan in the 70's. Yet, Scientology never > considered here, that an honest man might be telling the truth. They had > an opportunity to try to lay this off on the freezone, and did not take > it. I submit it is because it is exactly as it seems, a bungled > Scientology set-up attempt. They know it, and is why they never > considered what I said might be true. > > Tom Klemesrud SP5 > KoX > >Thank you for your reply, Tom; to me, you seem by far the most credible >through your actions since the incident, and your willingness to come >forward and talk about it. I feel sorry you got entangled in this in a >way; you are an innocent bystander who was hit by the Scientology truck. >People like me, ex-Scientologists, have every reason to fight them for >ruining our lives. > >You have no obvious reason to stand up to such a vicious, fascistic, >criminal organization; you could have dropped Dennis's account and run >from them...and yet you are right here with us. I thank you. > >ttyl, >martin. Tom is a totally stand-up guy. The scienos make these dirty trick incidents bizarre in order to do exactly this: get people to disbelieve that it could have happened just that way *because* it's so wierd. The opposite of Occam's Razor. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *