Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: RE: A Church Member Responds
Message-ID: <9512101310.0IIGO01@support.com>
References: <061357Z09121995@anon.penet.fi>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 95 13:10:40 -0800
Lines: 75


an451544@anon.penet.fi (Prignilliu)

>You must not have read my earlier posts. And even if you did read
>them, you didn't understand them. This is because you're so bigoted
>and full of hate that you're totally incapable of evaluating data.
>I've answered plenty of questions here. Just because I'm not answering
>the one YOU'RE asking right now! 
>
>Besides, who are you to ask me questions, anyway, Mr. Ars Bigot? What
>are your credentials? And why doesn't Rouge Agent and Bearwell ever
>answer my off-topic questions about CAN, psychiatry or what their real
>names are? Are you a psych? Huh?
>
>You must never have read anything by L. Ron Hubbard. And even if you
>did, you didn't understand it. And even if you did understand it,
>you've taken it completely out of context. And even if it's really in
>context, I can't find a reference for it. And even if I can find a
>reference for it, L. Ron Hubbard didn't really write it. Didn't you
>know a lot of his works were written by other people? The Scriptures
>of Scientology were purged in 1986. So it no longer exists. Or it's a
>forgery. Yeah, that's it. A forgery. Made up by ars bigots to make the
>Church look bad.
>
>Besides, it's a trade secret. So you'd better quit quoting it, or
>we'll sue you.
>
>A long, long time ago, several centuries almost, parts of Scientology
>were infiltrated by evil criminals like Mary Sue Hubbard, Dick Weigand
>and Ken Moxon. But we've gotten rid of all that now. And even if we
>haven't gotten rid of the people, we've gotten rid of the policies.
>And even if we haven't gotten rid of the policies, we've gotten rid of
>the names of the policies. Scientology is just here to help people.
>Why can't you see that? 
>
>Your stories from affadavits by paid liars don't match my experience. 
>I've never seen with my own eyes the incidents you are describing. 
>You obviously can't stand to see anyone helped. Or else you want 
>Scientology so bad that you just have to bad-mouth it.
>
>Scientology is an applied religious philosophy. You have to do it to
>really understand it. You obviously have never taken a course. And
>even if you did take one, you didn't understand it. You went past a
>word you were too lazy to look up. And even if you did understand the
>course, you couldn't uphold the ethics of Scientology. The tech always
>works when applied correctly. So if it didn't work for you, it was
>your fault. What overts have you committed against the Church of
>Scientology?
>
>Besides, you're a child molester.
>
>A. Sienno
>
>
>+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
|  Prignillius                            na190820@anon.penet.fi    |
|                                         ^^                        |
|  WARNING: If you just "Reply" to this message, you will get an    |
|           anonymous ID, and I will know what it is.               |
|           If you want to email me, use the "na" address above.    |
|                                                                   |
|  People who have nothing to say usually just disguise it by       |
|  trying to attack the person who is saying something.  I admit I  |
|  haven't done so in every posting, but I certainly have done so   |
|  in specific instances.                                           |
|                                          cmiller@lightside.com    |
>+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +

    Troutman returns?
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
                 <dennis.l.erlich@support.com>
                     <inForm@primenet.com>