Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: **BIASED JOURNALISM** Message-ID: <9512172054.0TDS002@support.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Sun, 17 Dec 95 20:54:56 -0800 Lines: 47 referen@ibm.net (Diane Richardson) sthomson@netcom.com (shelley thomson) wrote: >It is >difficult for us to foresee anyone carrying an action to a conclusion >if Factnet does not. This little bit really pissed me off. Have I given the impression that I was wavering on my resolve to go the distance on this? I find the implication insulting, Shelly. Diane: >Including Dennis Erlich, of course, who will be abandoned by his >ex-scieno allies and left standing up for his principles alone >among them. Now, now, Diane. If they want to back out and take a settlement, that's their decision. I don't expect them to look out for my interests. It is not for others to live up to my expectaions of them. It is for me to live up to my own expectations of myself. >Dennis would still have friends rallying to his >cause, of course, MoFo, Tom Klemesrud, Priscilla Coates, but not >an ex-Scientologist[tm] among them. Oh, I don't know. Probably I'll piss off everybody eventually. I didn't go into this with a flock of supporters. I don't expect to leave with one. If people like me, they do so at their own risk. I am not known for my tact in certain circumstances. This was my own personal fight. If someone else wants to claim it and then withdraw from it, what's it to me? Geddit? +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *