Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: RE: Buffetts Message-ID: <9512191746.0OZC801@support.com> References: <199512192037.MAA20083@skylink.skylink.net> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Tue, 19 Dec 95 17:46:57 -0800 Lines: 145 Ted Mayett >Check this out. >Posted to ARS minutes ago. Nice. >I didn't think it would make it through. >The ad, under personals, reads. > >I publicly depart Scientology, I do >not believe in Xenu. I cannot afford >$360,000 for Spiritual Freedom. T.M. > >The ad runs one day only at a cost of $10.29 > >Dear OSA, if I have the price wrong I will run the ad again corrected. In >the meantime, do I get my Declare now? >These are my qualifications, per HCOPL 23 Dec. 1965RA >SUPPRESSIVE ACTS >SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS. > >Hubbard has a list of 72 recommend actions. I qualify on the following: 18 >-19- 20- 22- 23- 25- 26- 29- 44- 47- 50- 55- 62. > >I get the SP of the week award for #'s 62 and 25. >_All_ runner up awards for #'s 18-19-20. >And honorable mention for the rest. > >So what are you going to do about this? >With the above ad in today's paper I've taken the issue from cyberpace out >into the streets. I think you are afraid to Declare me. Afraid that I'll >take you to court. I believe that for less than $500.00 I can run a week >long ad in >1.2 million newspapers. How much are you going to cost me for this lousy >Declare? > >I taunt and mock OSA openly in public. > >I sent this letter, certified return receipt, 12/18/95 to CSI. > >------------------------------------------------------ >12/18/95 > >This letter is a request for the Declare I have coming. >By the time this letter is received I will have placed an >item in the Las Vegas Review Journal publicly departing >Scientology. > >I should have had that Declare by now. > >It is my intention to take Scientology to court >questioning the legality of issuing a document such as a Declare. > >I have been told several times by Janne Djork, ED CCLV, >that I have been Declared already. I have been told >VIA E-mail, over the internet, by Russell Shaw that I have >been Declared. I consider the actual document a mere >formality. As this document will aid the case I have in mind >I would like to have it. > >Ted Mayett >702-696-1966 >teddy@skylink.net >-------------------------------------------------------- > >So what are you people going to do? >Come 1996 I am going to start my court case. You can avoid all this by >changing or discarding some Policy. If you are unable or unwilling to do so >then I will have the Law do it for you. But this I promise, this Declare >business will be aired. > > >======================= >Public Disclaimer > >I do not believe there is an ARSCC. If there is I am not a part of it. >This action I am committing to is solely my own. >No person or group, through e-mail, snail mail, telephone, or in person, or >through any other medium has suggested or demanded that I do this. I've >been thinking on this for over a month now. During the whole time I kept my >own counsel, I never discussed it with anyone. >======================= > >And now I'd like to talk to my friends on ARS. >People, _I feel good_ it's nice to be taking action. >I qualify for this. No wife or children, no job to be fired from, (I >suppose they can shut the Casino's down) and no business the cult can >destroy. No outstanding warrants and no IRS problems. I do not drink or do >drugs. In a future post I will be listing my criminal record. I'm going to >do it before they can. The only action they can do is to meet me in court. >And they can bankrupt me. So be it. > >As of this writing the letters from them have been what they call "good >roads and warm weather" except for a letter from Russell Shaw saying that I >will get the Declare I want. >When I received Mr. Shaws e-mail is when I wrote back and told them I was >taking them to court. This NG is the last to know. > >I am taking this approach because I am curious as to how they handle it. > >This NG has also proved interesting. I threw a post up and there was no >response. I threw a post up with a direct question and saw two careful >responses. I then threw a post up with a different subject line and there >was no response. > >I find this acceptable. These are sick people we are dealing with. With >the ad I placed, with this post, I am locked onto a course. I am doing it >now because I want to see the clams kept off balance. The Netherlands was >delicious, hopefully Vegas proves appetizing. I have my reasons for doing >this. > >I would enjoy feedback and ideas though. The subject matter is now safe. > >When I told my brother yesterday about the ad I placed he said "you is crazy >boy" statements such as that may prove useful. The weight of this Declare >does weigh heavy on me. >I was first told I was Declared several months back, I have the date >archived. I was shocked and hurt when I heard this. >Also afraid. I still am apprehensive. Maybe I am acting irrational, but >all I'm really trying to do is protect myself. Get over it! Be proud to be suppressive to the spread of scienotology. Think of the children who will now go to college and not learn how to f*ck up each other's thought processes. No more Peckerwoodys. One was too many. >And maybe this last paragraph is a lie. > >Over to you OSA. >Ted Mayett I do appreciate that others are willing to put their butts on the line, too. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *