Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: URGENT APPEAL FOR SUP Message-ID: <9601110810.0BHN100@support.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Thu, 11 Jan 96 08:10:44 -0800 Lines: 47 av282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Martin G. V. Hunt) Tarla (to the venomslut, Vera): >>What the fuck would YOU know about principles, you nasty skank? YHN: > "Skank" indeed! I think we need an official opinion from > Martin Hunt (ars Keeper of the C-Word). Can we get a > measurement here, Martin? Martin: >Humph; well, er, ah, yes, I suppose so. > > Is "skank" the same as the C-word or not? Official Ruling: >Skank begins with an "s"; as such, it doesn't qualify as a C-word, per se. Ah. >However, it does fall into the realm of such ancillary terms as beaver, box, >crack, hairburger, hairpie, nookie, pee hole, pussy, quim, slit, snapper, >snatch, and twat, and as such, should be held in abeyance until final >determination of its status can be determined. There you have it, folks. Another decision, direct from arscc repleat (I love that word) with the Wisdom of Solomon(tm). >Using synonyms to get around the prohibition, while not illegal according >to the official Unwritten Rules (tm) of the ARSCC, is seen as posting in >bad faith. Indeed. So Tarla *is* in violation. Is that your ruling? Is there some penalty or fine that needs imposition in a case such as this? >Founder, ARSCC. Now we know why he's the Founder. Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *