Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: URGENT APPEAL FOR SUP
Message-ID: <9601110810.0BHN100@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 96 08:10:44 -0800
Lines: 47


av282@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Martin G. V. Hunt)

Tarla (to the venomslut, Vera):
>>What the fuck would YOU know about principles, you nasty skank?
                              
YHN:
>         "Skank" indeed!  I think we need an official opinion from
> Martin Hunt (ars Keeper of the C-Word).  Can we get a
> measurement here, Martin?
    
Martin:
>Humph; well, er, ah, yes, I suppose so. <clears throat impressively>
>
>         Is "skank" the same as the C-word or not?
       
Official Ruling:
>Skank begins with an "s"; as such, it doesn't qualify as a C-word, per se.
                
    Ah.  <murmurs in crowd>

>However, it does fall into the realm of such ancillary terms as beaver, box,
>crack, hairburger, hairpie, nookie, pee hole, pussy, quim, slit, snapper,
>snatch, and twat, and as such, should be held in abeyance until final
>determination of its status can be determined.
                           
    There you have it, folks.  Another decision, direct from 
    arscc repleat (I love that word) with the Wisdom of 
    Solomon(tm).

>Using synonyms to get around the prohibition, while not illegal according
>to the official Unwritten Rules (tm) of the ARSCC, is seen as posting in
>bad faith.
                
    Indeed.  So Tarla *is* in violation.  Is that your ruling?  
    Is there some penalty or fine that needs imposition in a case
    such as this?

>Founder, ARSCC.
 
    Now we know why he's the Founder.
    
    Rev. Dennis L Erlich   * * the inFormer * *
           <dennis.l.erlich@support.com>
               <inForm@primenet.com>
                  <tarbaby @ irc>