Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: ABOUT CLEARING TECHNO
Message-ID: <9601200925.0D8YF00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 96 09:25:51 -0800
Lines: 59


Mike_Reuss@HP-Loveland-om10.om.hp.com (Michael Reuss)

dmorgan@cts.com (dmorgan@cts.com) wrote:
> You [Rev. Dennis L Erlich (inForm@primenet.com)] imply that I work
> hand in hand with the church..and/or give them data. I say this is a
> falsehood...show your proof in this newsgroup.

Michael:
>Old Timer, Dennis owes you nothing.
        
    Whyte has not yet ruled on that.  BTW, he moved back two 
    dates for my case.  The Case Management meeting was supposed 
    to be yesterday (19th), and a hearing was set for Feb 16th.  
    He's moved both sometime in March and April.

>Dennis' claim will remain just that, a claim. This is the only way it
>can be to those of us who demand proof before we consider such claims
>to have been verified.
                                                
    I got a call from Lamont last night.  He told me in no 
    uncertain terms that the cult messed up his family, much like
    they did mine.  He is not Tumor.  He is getting his music 
    career pumped back up to the level it would have been at if he
    had not been involved in the cult.  He appears on TV and is 
    playing around the country.
    
    Also, I found out that Cathy Cariotaki is somewhat unlikely. 
    There was an Ethics Officer (woman) at AOLA in the 70s who is
    a likely candidate to Tumor.  I can't recall her name.  Marge
    (?) Something?

>The way I understand it, he does not want to present evidence to
>support his claims, for reasons he does not care to divulge. He merely
>wants people who would otherwise unquestioningly support and trust you
>to consider the possibility that you are in contact with the OSA. Sound
>fair enough to you? It does to me.
                  
    That's it, Michael.  Precisely.

>I'll try to say this kindly, but to me it is self-evident, and cannot
>go unsaid; your committment to Hubbard and his tech as your godhead is
>delusional. Devotion to Hubbard's spewings will lead people by the nose
>down the same path which the cult has already taken, and with the same
>unfortunate conclusions.  For your own sake, forsake Hubbard and his
>tech. You'll be glad you did.
>
>Respectfully,
>--
>Michael Reuss
>Honorary Kid
 
    Nicely put.
    
    Rev. Dennis L Erlich   * * the inFormer * *
          <dennis.l.erlich@support.com>
              <inForm@primenet.com>