Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: MISTREATMENT? Message-ID: <9603182143.0UIE001@support.com> References: <4iiecl$oc1@bessel.nando.net> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 21:43:07 -0800 Lines: 70 Whipsnapper >Now I get it, Dennis. Perhaps it went something like this: you were in >deep shit for being such a creep, you didn't want to take the heat for >the damage you'd done, nor even admit to any of it. You knew you'd be >(rightly) declared a suppressive anyway, so you ran like a coward in the >night? > >Am I anywhere near the mark? Nope. I worked for and believed in my church for 15 years and attempted to reform the barbaric and repressive practices. When I couldn't, I took my family and left. >Steps A-E, as Dennis knows, are steps for a declared "suppressive" to >follow in order to have the onus removed. They have nothing whatever to >do with a staff member leaving, unless of course the person has been >declared. Departure from staff and a suppressive declare do occasionally >go hand in hand, of course, as they probably did with Dennis. If you fail to complete a contract or just want to leave staff without being hassled to death, you will likely be declared. Post A to E, Whimp. > Anybody assigned the condition of Liability or below is subject >to disconnection. Don't you be lying to the wogs. > >Dennis is lying here. Just flat simple falsehood and he knows it. Penalties for Lower Conditions describes this. I am being sued for posting the policy. >The Conditions, including Liability, have nothing to do with any of this, >except as they are a tool of ethics -- one's own *personal* ethics in >most cases, to be personally applied on one's own initiative. And below Liability, the person is not to be in contact with others. >Again it is a deliberate confusion of unrelated things. Departure from >staff doesn't equal a suppressive declare and neither equals the >Liability condition and none of those things is equal to mashed potatoes. Ah, but you equal a lying pile of sh*t, Whimp. >Dennis is just floundering madly here, folks, I have no idea why. It's >truly weird, because I don't see what he gains from creating all this >confusion, unless it is just to camouflage his lies. But they're exposed >to view regardless. The words "losing it" come to mind. Tell us the ones about how scientology is compatible with all other religions, how there is no basement at the Fort Harrison Hotel or how Margaret Singer kidnapped and tortured your wife. >But he does sometimes know when to abandon a lie. I notice, for example, >that he has ceased to repeat the "basement" canard. F*ck you, you lying scumbag. Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *