Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: SHERILYN'S REPONSE TO
Message-ID: <9605151719.0OBS601@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 15 May 96 17:19:01 -0700
Lines: 61


sose278720@aol.com (SOse278720)

>I'm afraid you've lost me here, Sherilyn.  What "extraordinary claims" has
>Steve made?

    1)  That Lyman Spurlock raped someone, and that whole fercockte
    shtick.

    2)  That Lonesome Whatever is factual.
    
    Those are somewhat extrordinary claims.

>Diane is the one who made the "extraordinary claims", in
>accusing Steve of this fantastic masquerade, for which he has no
>conceivable motivation that I can logically discern.  As you say,
>"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", and I have seen
>*none*-zippo, zilch- for this cockeyed concoction.
 
    Are you saying that even though it may be true, that Diane has 
    absolutely no actual *proof* it's true?  Even she'd have to 
    admit that.
    
    When things don't make sense, people are left to speculate,
    eh?

>(of the LaVenda aol account) the lifelike
>complexity and unpredictability of her behavior on the group.  
 
    Nearly like a real person.

>She warn't
>followin' *nobody's* script -nossir!
 
    Perhaps writing one, tho.

>  I *hate* it when people say this about people on ars, 
 
    And we care?

>Hope I'm not outta line, as Dennis says.
 
    Lenny Bruce said that.  And yes, your coincidental first-time
    appearance just in time to defend Steve's little disception 
    makes me wonder.  Hmmm.

    Steve has been caught. He should set the facts straight re 
    LaVenda and Lyman.  He should admit that his autobiographical
    fantasy is not factual.  
    
    Geddit?  NOT factual.

    Ball'zin his court.

           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
                 <dennis.l.erlich@support.com>
                     <inForm@primenet.com>