Path: rambo.bobo.net!xs4all!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!xs4all!bullseye.news.demon.net!demon!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!woodstock.news.demon.net!demon!news.idt.net!netnews.com!priori!newsfeed.concentric.net!207.155.183.80.MISMATCH!global-news-master
From: informer@informer.org (Rev Dennis Erlich)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Hello Critics of Scientology and Scientologists;
Date: 05 Aug 1998 10:47:13 EDT
Organization: inFormer Ministry [a 501(c)3 non-profit, religious organization]
Message-ID: <35ca711b.4027794@news.concentric.net>
References: <35c6175c.21491954@news.tiac.net> <1998080320580100.QAA00593@ladder01.news.aol.com> <6q5b7l$vnf$1@nnrp3.snfc21.pbi.net> <gzRcSkBni2x1EwDc@xemu.demon.co.uk> <35c84332.15254488@news.atnet.at>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts026d46.lax-ca.concentric.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
X-No-Archive: yes
Lines: 28
Xref: rambo.bobo.net alt.religion.scientology:97323

ralph@atnet.at (Ralph Hilton):

>I don't have the policy to hand but this is correct. Data given up in sec checks
>is not considered "sacred". It is turned over to HCO and is considered
>actionable.

   Definitely so, Ralph.

>Even session data is non-actionable for the person receiving the auditing only.

   There is no non-actionable confession in the cult.  An auditor is
required by Reports policy in Vol 4 of the OEC to write an ethics
report on any out-ethics the mark gives up in session. 

>If a person gives up data relating to the actions of others then that is
>considered actionable.

   Giving up someone else's overts or withholds is a sign of similars
of their own.

>So the only overts which it would not be considered correct for Jesse to discuss
>are those given up by an individual in the course of their own auditing.

   I'll leave up to Jesse what he wants to reveal about whom, and how.

   Rev Dennis Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
           <inForm@primenet.com>
            <inForm@newsguy.com>