Path: bogie.dyn.ml.org!xs4all!xs4all!news.cs.utwente.nl!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!newsfeed.wli.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.concentric.net!207.155.183.80.MISMATCH!global-news-master From: inFormer@informer.org (Rev Dennis Erlich) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Remember Dennis? Re: It *Just* Doesn't Matter Date: 04 Oct 1998 19:15:04 PDT Organization: inFormer Ministry [a 501(c)3 non-profit, religious organization] "... in service of cult victims and their families." Lines: 48 Message-ID: <361d2ae9.35870186@news.concentric.net> References: <199810010439.GAA13420@replay.com> <3613FCE0.975@daisy.freeserve.co.uk> <36144b5c.624569@news.mindspring.com> <3619e51c.17998667@news.concentric.net> <3617eddd.103111749@nntp.ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: informer@informer.org NNTP-Posting-Host: ts024d22.lax-ca.concentric.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 X-No-Archive: yes Xref: bogie.dyn.ml.org alt.religion.scientology:122133 seekon@spamblock.ix.netcom.com (Conner): yhn >> After the hearing Whyte called us all into chambers and tried to >>convince the scienos that if the trial (there might be two jury >>trials) go(es) forward the scienos were in serious jeopardy, and that >>they best work out a way to settle with me. He talked about a long, >>unpleasant trial, which would no doubt lead to appeal. And an outcome >>which no one might like. 3 > two trials? what would lead to this bifurcation? Whyte has continually said he wants to divide their copyright claim and my counter claims into two separate trials. >> What he was telling the scienos is that they had considerable >>downside if they chose to pursue their barratry. They could lose >>their copyrights on a number of money-making levels. Whyte already >>said that OT3 was probably in the public domain. The whole transfer >>document issue will be questioned. We demand to have our document >>expert review the notary log and the transfer. Their copyrights are >>shaky, just like I believed in the beginning. > > whew! who would have believed the whyteman would > actually geddit. this is pretty heady stuff. It's best not to get too optimistic. Whyte has been ignoring my rights for several years. It would not surprise me if he continues to do so. >> So anyhow, Whyte, in chambers tells us he is ordering settlement >>and that we best go along with it. It will be in front of judge >>Fogel, in San Jose on October 14th. >> > i presume this is not a public hearing, Nope. Actually, both sides meet with the settlement judge separately, one after another. >and is but the first > of probably several? ? Rev Dennis Erlich * * the inFormer * *