Path: rambo.bobo.net!xs4all!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!het.net!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.wli.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!207.155.183.80.MISMATCH!global-news-master From: inFormer@informer.org (Rev Dennis Erlich) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Clinton & Scientology? Date: 17 Dec 1998 09:03:00 PST Organization: inFormer Ministry [a 501(c)3 non-profit, religious organization] "... in service of cult victims and their families." Lines: 31 Message-ID: <367b36b6.2173834@news.concentric.net> References: <3678EB64.E02E450F@nospam.u.net> Reply-To: informer@informer.org NNTP-Posting-Host: ts035d32.lax-ca.concentric.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 X-No-Archive: yes Xref: rambo.bobo.net alt.religion.scientology:155714 "Jim M." : >Is Scientology supporting Clinton? No. They believe they have the president cornered, is all. >Lot's of friends in high places? Lots of money backed by lots of money and the influence it buys. >Richard Gere (Scientologist) is big on the news now as opposing >impeachment...is speaking at rallies, etc. Never heard that one. Gere is a well known Buddhist, I believe. >Others in Hollywood are too. No one will want to admit it very soon. >Do they have a lot to loose if Clinton goes? Quite the contrary. They lose if Billy ~isn't~ discredited. They yanked the chain on Clinton using Travolta to stifle German concern, just to show folks how much leverage they had on history. That was their "wagging the dog." Rev Dennis Erlich * * the inFormer * *