Path: rambo.bobo.net!xs4all!xs4all!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!207.155.183.80.MISMATCH!global-news-master From: inFormer@informer.org (Rev Dennis Erlich) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,misc.legal Subject: Re: Erlich vs Co$: The Clams Back Off Date: 19 Dec 1998 18:22:10 PST Organization: inFormer Ministry [a 501(c)3 non-profit, religious organization] "... in service of cult victims and their families." Lines: 25 Message-ID: <368a5f1a.33988917@news.concentric.net> References: <367d1391.38516354@news.concentric.net> <367B3CF3.6D601098@xs4all.nl> <36802fdf.45763084@news.concentric.net> <367bddf9.2296877@news.newsguy.com> <367C485B.33AB@iag.net> Reply-To: informer@informer.org NNTP-Posting-Host: ts033d33.lax-ca.concentric.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 X-No-Archive: yes Xref: rambo.bobo.net alt.religion.scientology:156632 misc.legal:2840 Beverly Rice : >Seems to me that the Judge NEVER should have put his signature on >that Writ of Seizure to begin with. I'm sure after all this bs from the scienos, Whyte feels the same. >My question is, isn't it a Judge's responsibility to be sure >that a Writ is being presented to him honestly and not under >deception like the Co$ did BEFORE he signs it? One would think federal judges might be more careful about violating people's civil rights. But alas, that's not the way it works irl. >Or is a Writ just like a paper in an Autograph Album, where a >Judge just looks at it and puts his John Henry on it without >a second thought? Just curious, if anyone knows. Second thoughts are forced on federal judges only by appeals courts or the supreme court. Rev Dennis Erlich * * the inFormer * *