Path: rambo.bobo.net!xs4all!xs4all!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newspeer1.nac.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!207.155.183.80.MISMATCH!global-news-master From: inFormer@informer.org (Rev Dennis Erlich) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Erlich vs Co$: The Clams Back Off Date: 20 Dec 1998 19:22:54 PST Organization: inFormer Ministry [a 501(c)3 non-profit, religious organization] "... in service of cult victims and their families." Lines: 14 Message-ID: <3683bb87.41816424@news.concentric.net> References: <367e6c23.33295240@news.snafu.de> <3680f3be.6502254@news.concentric.net> <367d4883.3869746@enews.newsguy.com> Reply-To: informer@informer.org NNTP-Posting-Host: ts030d44.lax-ca.concentric.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 X-No-Archive: yes Xref: rambo.bobo.net alt.religion.scientology:156937 Dave Bird : > I asked this in a British context and was told pretty definitely not: > once a lawyer has agreed to work without charge then that's it, > the party they represent has no legal costs (and can't reclaim > expenses they haven't incurred). I expect he could be reimbursed > for costs he has incurred, though, e.g. travel or copying. The court > could also levy on the losers ITS costs for court time etcetera. MoFo will collect on both it's fees and costs. Rev Dennis Erlich * * the inFormer * *