On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:13:23 GMT, hkhenson@rogers.com (Keith Henson) wrote:
>Please take a look and either post or email me corrections or
>suggestions. The URLs links will be replaced by paper documents.
Thanks for the help, you know who you are. :-)
Next and maybe final draft.
Keith Henson
H. Keith Henson
176 Henry St., #45
Brantford, Ontario N3S 5C8
Canada
Telephone: (519) 770-0646
(519) 774-1620 cell
Pro Se
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
In re:KEITH HENSON,DebtorHILLARY DEZOTELL, KEN HODEN, and BRUCE
WAGONER, Plaintiffs, vs.H. KEITH HENSON
Defendant. )))))))))))))))))) CASE NO.: 98-51326
ASW-7ADV.NO.035136REQUEST FOR MORE TIME TO RESPONDREQUEST TO PROPOUND
INTERROGATORIES time: NADATE: NA
David Cook, attorney for DEZOTELL, HODEN and WAGONER has moved the court to rule in summary judgment July 26, 2005, to make the claims of these individuals non-dischargeable.
The motion has a certain superficial plausibility, but as the Court is well aware, this is an unusual case, as were the underlying cases. I refer the court to Exhibits A, an amicus brief I filed in a Florida wrongful death case, and Exhibit B, a letter to the Justice Department requesting a civil rights investigation.
A detailed reply to Mr. Cook's motion is a major undertaking and will take time to properly document. As an example, the primary witness against me, Ken Hoden, has been reported to be in Scientology's notorious punishment program, the Rehabilitation Project Force(1). (A number of these reports were publicly posted starting October 2, 2004.) Because the people involved are terrified of their names and addresses being known to Scientology, getting reliable information about what has happened to Ken Hoden to the Court presents a difficult problem. I may have to ask the Court for the assistance of law enforcement or the US Marshall's office to certify that the declaration was signed in their presence under oath and then redact the declarant's name from a declaration
Exactly why Ken Hoden was placed on the punishment program is not known, but as the "base captain" an obvious candidate would be if he were assigned responsibility for one or both of the women who died at "Gold Base" in the Spring of 2000. (2) If Ken Hoden was in or being threatened with the RPF in 2001 when he testified against me, the underlying criminal case and therefore the DEZOTELL case would be fraud on the courts due to testimony given under duress.
In addition, it appears that one or more of the plaintiffs or their agents in this case has engaged in extralegal criminal harassment against the debtor. (Exhibit C is a letter to the US trustee, Exhibit D is a Brantford Expositor story from July 2, 2005)
An officer with the Ontario Provincial Police tracked the harassment and assault back through two levels of private investigation firms to a client in the US. The US client told him they are engaged in a lawsuit against me. I discussed the matter last week by telephone with David Cook and received a most evasive reply. I have attempted to discuss the matter with Elaine Seid through email, but her email does not work at the moment.
Since there are multiple creditors and it would be unfair to falsely accuse one of them. I request the court permit interrogatories to be served on the creditor parties to determine which one of them is engaging in the extralegal criminal harassment here in Canada.
Respectfully submitted,
H. Keith Henson, pro se
Dated July 14, 2005
(1) Volume 8, No. 1 (September 2003)
Scientology and the European Human Rights Debate:
A Reply to Leisa Goodman, J. Gordon Melton, and the European
Rehabilitation Project Force Study
Stephen A. Kent
Department of Sociology
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
T6G 2H4
http://www.uni-marburg.de/religionswissenschaft/journal/mjr/kent3.html
(2) The circumstances of one young woman being sent into a hot transformer vault and another dying because of unlighted construction machines on a public road after dark would have (in my opinion) supported charges of "depraved indifference murder." No one was charged in the transformer vault death. While the driver in the construction machinery death was convicted of manslaughter, the persons who sent him out after dark were not charged.