From: Gerry Armstrong <armstrong@dowco.com>
Subject: Graham re Intervenors in Henson Malicious Prosecution
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:52:50 -0800
Message-ID: <k1s01tkkev6p4g5tahqt8tig3eo7kmttdb@4ax.com>
Graham, and everyone else too, of course, all sorts of lawyers and
laymen:
In that the $cientology organization, as directed by David Miscavige,
will use the outcome of the malicious prosecution action against Keith
Henson against every other opponent of $cientology, in or out of the
legal arena, does every other opponent have a reasonable and legal
right to intervene in some fashion?
I recall your successful intervention on behalf of Joe Yanny in my
civil case right after the crime cult sued me in Marin Co. Superior
Court.
$cientology can be shown to have the hidden, evil, and legally
unallowable intention of using a "conviction" or even a charge against
Henson to vilify a group, or class they link to him. The evidence of
this being $cientology's hidden evil intention is by this time
overwhelming.
What is the maximum reasonable and legal involvement a third party has
a right to in the Henson prosecution in the insane false terrorist
threat case?
I know that Arnie Lerma wrote an amicus brief of one form or another,
which shows his heart is in the right place. But is there something
which could be done by the individuals who will as a class be directly
affected by the outcome? You yourself, being a picketer, and an
opponent of $cientology in its War On Wogs (WOW!) (R), are a major
member of the class.
Thanks.
© Gerry Armstrong
From: Gerry Armstrong <armstrong@dowco.com>
Subject: Graham, Keith, further thoughts about the Henson malicious prosecution case
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:18:45 -0800
Message-ID: <ars01t48soga0jnj9oi0vs9tnvm6eckhh3@4ax.com>
In my particular case, I am a key witness for Keith because of my
personal knowledge and experience of the War On Wogs (WOW!)(R) and my
person knowledge and experience of him, having picketed with him, and
having been his single retained expert witness at his copyright
infringement trial, where, as God would have it in this sort of thing,
you defended him. And you defended him not without just any witness,
but without one of the foremost experts on $cientology's War On Wogs
(R) and its attendant insanities; such as the suppressive person
doctrine, black PR, fair game, attack the attacker, and use of the law
to harass, and the source of that war and those insanities, L. Ron
Hubbard.
Keith's sole witness, willing to testify and having been given $150.00
from him as a retainer, was prevented from testifying, as admitted to
by $cientology, by the criminal cult's obtaining, on the basis of an
impossible, illegal, insane California State Judge's order, a further
order that I be fined and jailed, and a warrant for my arrest should I
set foot in California.
The basis for the jail order, fine and warrant, as again only God
would have it, was a declaration I wrote and sent to Judge Whyte in
the Ward, Henson and Erlich cases concerning a threat received from
criminal cult lawyer Andy Wilson, after being served with a subpoena
duces tecum by Grady.
Being an expert, as I say, by the way, I tailored the declaration, in
response to the Wilson threat, so it could be used in oppositions to
$cientology's summary adjudication or judgment motions about to fall
on Ward, Henson and Erlich. You might look over that declaration and
consider what might have happened if at trial Keith had had a live
expert witness with, inter alia, all that to say.
To put the rest of the icing on the case, the initial and
precipitating reason I left California, and the U$, was my discovery
of $cientology's 1023 IR$ submission, on which the tax exemption is
based, containing four pages of black PR on me. Which, incidentally,
the crime cultists and their crime cult lawyers didn't produce in
their various $cientology v. Gerald Armstrong cases from 1992 onward.
I only found the cult's 1023 filing because in January, 1997 I got my
first internet account, right around the time Grady served me, but
years after it might have done some good, and sure was relevant, in
all my litigations.
The crime cult, of course, throws its IR$ tax exemption around and
files it as an exhibit in every case it files against wogs (R). My
little part in all of this is as proof that $cientology obtained its
tax exemption (I say in part, because there are undoubtedly other
criminal factors) by fraud.
In that sense I have a standing that Keith didn't have in relationship
to the IR$ decision regarding the antisocial, antiwog (R) $cientology
corporations and people. But once standing is established, I think
Keith would be able to join and hence enjoy the fun he's fought for
all this time and so richly deserves.
If it is recognized that $cientology's unclean hands, using an illegal
order obtained by unclean hands, prevented a defendant's single and
absolutely key witness from testifying, I believe that no
uncompromised court, no court unoccupied by cult collaborators, would
not grant a new trial. And the opportunity exists until such time as
$cientology withdraws its warrants against me, cancels its contempt
orders, jettisons its judgments, and gives up its ungodly gag <gag>
"agreements."
Since Keith was denied his sole witness by $cientology, so was Grady.
Didn't Grady see what happened to Keith in a courtroom without a
witness? You did, right?
© Gerry Armstrong
