Depends on how many scientologists they managed to get on the jury.

From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Keith Henson, can you clarify this?
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:13:03 -0700
Message-ID: <uq6setcktb4qj7jujk0vd8r118r724sj4m@4ax.com>

On 30 Apr 2001 18:20:27 -0600, janda@dimensional.com (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) wrote: > In a previous post you said something about the reason why the judge wouldn't
> let you mention scumatology is because "the benefits were outweight by the
> predujuice that would be cause".
Yes, this is right out of California Evidence code 352. > Isn't the judge just admitting that if the jury knew the cult was suing
> you, a snowball in a pot of boiling water in hell would have a better chance?
Depends on how many scientologists they managed to get on the jury. Keith Henson