Subject: my comments on sentencing report (prelim)
From: Kristi Wachter <humanrights@racerrecords.com>
Organization: http://www.scientology-lies.com
Message-ID: <3b05df89$1@news2.lightlink.com>
Date: 18 May 2001 22:50:49 -0400
MAN. Outrageous.
This is a VERY early start; I hope to turn it into a web page
in the next few days.
I would appreciate comments and corrections, and Keith, I hope you'll do
one of these, too - you know way more about the situation than I do.
<grin>
Below is the sentencing memorandum in the Keith Henson trial. This
document was withheld from Keith's attorney, Jim Harr,
until Harr arrived in court on the day sentencing was scheduled, May 16,
2001.
This document contains numerous falsehoods and extremely prejudicial
omissions. My comments (with ***/****) are an attempt to balance
the information and misinformation in this government document.
I hope Keith will provide commentary of his own.
Part One.
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE OFFENSE:
Source: Reports of the Riverside County Sheriff's Department,
#DR00201037.
On July 19, 2000, at approximately 4:22 p.m., a deputy responded to
Golden Era Productions, located at 19626 Highway 79, San Jacinto,
regarding threats being made over the Internet.
***The comments that Scientology chose to interpret as threats were, of
course, not being made at that time, as Keith was on the
highway picketing. The comments had been made weeks before. It was the
constitutionally-protected protest that prompted the call.****
Upon arrival, contact
was made with Ken Hoden, General Manager of Golden Era Productions
(Church of Scientology).
***Ken Hoden works in OSA, the Office of Special Affairs. This is the
department of Scientology that handles PR.
It's also the branch that attempts to neutralize anything it sees as a
threat. OSA was previously known as the GO - the Guardian's
Office. During the 70s, Guardian's Office executives were conducting
massive infiltration and espionage programs in government
offices around the world. There is enormous evidence that the GO's illegal
acts and dirty tricks have continued to the present day.****
Mr. Hoden advised that Keith Henson, the defendant, has been outside
their church, protesting since May 26, 2000.
***Not continuously, of course.****
On July 15, 2000, Mr.
Hoden advised he noticed some threats being made against the church on
the Internet news group alt. Religion. scientology.
***There is evidence that designated OSA staffers monitor the
alt.religion.scientology newsgroup DAILY. It is
highly improbable that Hoden had only recently become aware of Henson's
newsgroup posts.****
Mr. Holden had his
"Internet expert", Gavina Idda explain to the deputy how the news
group operates.
***A former Scientologist, Tory Bezazian, has recently identified Gavina
Idda as a major player in Scientology's massive
denial-of-service attack on alt.religion.scientology. During that attack,
the newsgroup was flooded with
hundreds of thousands of messages, making the newsgroup effectively
unreadable. In addition, thousands
of racist messages were forged in the names of a.r.s. posters.****
Gavina advised the news group site is a site where people talk about
their disbelief in the Church of Scientology.
***That's a very misleading description of a.r.s. People also talk about
their belief in Scientology and their personal gains
from it; Scientology's criminal history; free speech; freedom of religion;
Robert Heinlein; Scientology's favorite bugaboo, psychiatry;
effective use of newsreader software; and a wide range of other topics,
most touching in some way on Scientology.****
Gavina showed the deputy
numerous documents that he printed from the Internet site, where he
believes the defendant is making threats against the church. In the
documents, it shows the defendant discussing how an ICMB (Inter
Continental Ballistic Missile) could be accurate enough to hit the
Church of Scientology. Gavina also showed documents that have pictures
of the church in San Jacinto, with satellite coordinates, so that a
missile could be accurately launched at the church. The documents also
show the defendant discussing how one would have to watch for weather
for more accurate missile shots.
***When considering the credibility of threatening speech, context is
essential. Under the California laws at issue in this
case, both the speaker's intent and his/her ability to carry out an
apparent threat are considerations. Context makes it clear
that Keith was joking. Common sense makes it clear that there was no
genuine threat to the safety and well-being of any
Scientologist; despite Keith's explosives expertise, discussed in great
length below, it would be so difficult for Keith to obtain
and launch an ICBM as to be virtually impossible.****
An excerpt from another document printed from the site, shows the
defendant stating that, "Killing the organization off entirely is the
best way to change the future of Scientology". (This quote was taken
from a document written by the defendant in April 1997, on the same
Internet news group).
***Note that this statement had been made THREE YEARS before the complaint
was filed. During that time, Keith had, as stated in
this report, picketed Scientology frequently; Keith made no threats and
committed no incidents of violence. It is inconceivable that Scientology
executives at Golden Era were unaware of the 1997
post before June 2000. Why were they bringing it up now? As for the his
comment about "killing the organization off entirely", he is clearly
referring to the end of the organization, not to physical harm to any
(much less all) individual Scientologists. Scientology has become so
corrupt
that some active Scientologists are also coming to believe that the
destruction of the Scientology corporation is the best hope for the
continuation of those parts of Scientology that they find beneficial.****
Mr. Hoden informed that his students, and his employees are afraid of
the defendant because he has also made threats in the past toward
Church of Scientology.
***That is simply false. To the extent that students and employees at
Golden Era are afraid of Keith, it is because Scientology teaches them
to be afraid of all critics of Scientology. The vast majority of Golden
Era residents have no access to the internet and so would not have seen
Keith's posts unless executives intentionally showed them to them. Because
Scientology teaches Scientologists that critics are
dangerous, individual Scientologists rarely talk to protestors (with the
exception of OSA staffers, who "handle" protestors as part of their jobs).
It is
unlikely that students and employees would have had any idea who the
protestor was unless their seniors told them.****
He showed the deputy a copy of a deposition
that the defendant was to attend with the church leader, David
Miscavige, in May 1997. That document states an employee of Southwest
Airlines, overhead threatening conversations between the defendant and
another person. As a result, the deposition was deferred for
Miscavige's safety, by a San Jose judge.
***Once again, this is false. Under federal law, the Southwest employee
would have been obligated to report Keith to airport authorities.
No report was made - because the conversation mentioned here never took
place. This is outrageous.****
Another document shows another person on the Internet site, saying
that GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) will not be needed as long as
the defendant is standing on the hill providing IR (Infared)
illumination for the missiles. Another document shows the defendant
saying Miscavige has to "Watch for cruise missiles as well as eagles".
***These are clearly jokes. The "cruise" missiles comment is a play on
words, referring to celebrity Scientologists Tom Cruise. The notion of
using attack eagles is simply ludicrous. A reasonable person (the usual
standard by which threatening language is judged), reading these
statements in context, would not construe them as threats.****
As a result of the past contacts Mr. Hoden and his church have had
with the defendant, he told the deputy they are all afraid of the
defendant, because of his knowledge of missiles and explosives.
***Again, this is false. Scientology executives either are afraid or
pretend to be afraid of ALL critics. Scientology has tried to use the
courts to stop numerous critics from picketing during the past five years;
none of those critics had ever made any comments that could
even be misconstrued as threats. Furthermore, numerous San Francisco Bay
Area OSA staffers have had even more "contact" with Keith, since he
pickets
regularly in the Bay Area. He picketed in San Francisco less than two
weeks before his sentencing date. Scientologists - at least half of whom
knew
who Keith was - walked with Keith and talked with him during his picket.
They exhibited NO fear of Keith at all.****
Mr.
Hoden said that he, his employees, and students, have had to alter
their day-to-day activities at the church, as a result of their fear.
***While this may be true, it is not a reasonable fear and thus not one
that Keith should bear the consequences of. As I've noted, Scientology
teaches fear of ALL critics. Other critics have picketed at Golden Era
without Keith; the Scientologists showed the same behavior, fleeing the
picket signs. In particular, Bruce Pettycrew saw Scientologists retreat
from an outdoor project at the appearance of his picket signs, leaving
a wheelbarrow full of concrete to harden in the sun. Scientology has tried
to stop Bruce from picketing in Mesa (near Phoenix), AZ, claiming he
was shouting and disrupting them. Bruce does not shout when he pickets;
traffic's too loud and fast in Mesa for that to make any sense.
Scientology's
attempt to use the courts to stop Bruce's pickets (based on alleged
disruption, not alleged fear of Bruce) failed. Nevertheless, when Bruce
appeared
at Golden Era to peacefully picket, Scientologists fled. It has nothing to
do with threats and everything to do with Scientology's deliberate
creation of
fear.****
They are afraid to walk around the church when the defendant is
outside protesting, because they fear he might be armed with some kind
of explosive weapon.
***To repeat: as demonstrated by their past behavior, they are afraid to
walk around the church when
ANYONE is outside protesting, because they are taught to be afraid.****
Comments? Corrections? Suggestions?
My thoughts are with you, Keith (and you, Arel!) (and all the good folks
up in Canada!).
Appalled,
Kristi
--
Kristi Wachter
the activist formerly known as "Jour" (before $cientology outed me)
If I am not who you say I am, then you are not who you think you are.
- James Baldwin
I think $cientology is hurting people and breaking the law, and I
want them to stop it. See http://www.scientology-lies.com for more.
From: ethercat <ethercat@arscc-atl.com>
Subject: Re: my comments on sentencing report (prelim)
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:53:21 -0400
Organization: www.arscc-atl.com
Message-ID: <sqldgt8trg7mmgm9q091qe5sft368g7ebr@4ax.com>
Good job, Kristi. Thanks. More comments below.
On 18 May 2001 22:50:49 -0400, Kristi Wachter
<humanrights@racerrecords.com> wrote in
<3b05df89$1@news2.lightlink.com>:
>MAN. Outrageous.
>
>This is a VERY early start; I hope to turn it into a web page
>in the next few days.
>
>I would appreciate comments and corrections, and Keith, I hope you'll do
>one of these, too - you know way more about the situation than I do.
><grin>
>
>Below is the sentencing memorandum in the Keith Henson trial. This
>document was withheld from Keith's attorney, Jim Harr,
>until Harr arrived in court on the day sentencing was scheduled, May 16,
>2001.
>
>This document contains numerous falsehoods and extremely prejudicial
>omissions. My comments (with ***/****) are an attempt to balance
>the information and misinformation in this government document.
>
>I hope Keith will provide commentary of his own.
>
>
>Part One.
>
>CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE OFFENSE:
>
>Source: Reports of the Riverside County Sheriff's Department,
>#DR00201037.
>
>On July 19, 2000, at approximately 4:22 p.m., a deputy responded to
>Golden Era Productions, located at 19626 Highway 79, San Jacinto,
>regarding threats being made over the Internet.
>
>***The comments that Scientology chose to interpret as threats were, of
>course, not being made at that time, as Keith was on the
>highway picketing. The comments had been made weeks before. It was the
>constitutionally-protected protest that prompted the call.****
>
>Upon arrival, contact
>was made with Ken Hoden, General Manager of Golden Era Productions
>(Church of Scientology).
>
>***Ken Hoden works in OSA, the Office of Special Affairs. This is the
>department of Scientology that handles PR.
>It's also the branch that attempts to neutralize anything it sees as a
>threat. OSA was previously known as the GO - the Guardian's
>Office. During the 70s, Guardian's Office executives were conducting
>massive infiltration and espionage programs in government
>offices around the world. There is enormous evidence that the GO's illegal
>acts and dirty tricks have continued to the present day.****
>
>Mr. Hoden advised that Keith Henson, the defendant, has been outside
>their church, protesting since May 26, 2000.
>
>***Not continuously, of course.****
>
>On July 15, 2000, Mr.
>Hoden advised he noticed some threats being made against the church on
>the Internet news group alt. Religion. scientology.
>
>***There is evidence that designated OSA staffers monitor the
>alt.religion.scientology newsgroup DAILY. It is
>highly improbable that Hoden had only recently become aware of Henson's
>newsgroup posts.****
>
>Mr. Holden had his
>"Internet expert", Gavina Idda explain to the deputy how the news
>group operates.
>
>***A former Scientologist, Tory Bezazian, has recently identified Gavina
>Idda as a major player in Scientology's massive
>denial-of-service attack on alt.religion.scientology. During that attack,
>the newsgroup was flooded with
>hundreds of thousands of messages, making the newsgroup effectively
>unreadable. In addition, thousands
>of racist messages were forged in the names of a.r.s. posters.****
>
>Gavina advised the news group site is a site where people talk about
>their disbelief in the Church of Scientology.
>
>***That's a very misleading description of a.r.s. People also talk about
>their belief in Scientology and their personal gains
>from it; Scientology's criminal history; free speech; freedom of religion;
>Robert Heinlein; Scientology's favorite bugaboo, psychiatry;
>effective use of newsreader software; and a wide range of other topics,
>most touching in some way on Scientology.****
>
>Gavina showed the deputy
>numerous documents that he printed from the Internet site, where he
>believes the defendant is making threats against the church. In the
>documents, it shows the defendant discussing how an ICMB (Inter
>Continental Ballistic Missile) could be accurate enough to hit the
>Church of Scientology. Gavina also showed documents that have pictures
>of the church in San Jacinto, with satellite coordinates, so that a
>missile could be accurately launched at the church. The documents also
>show the defendant discussing how one would have to watch for weather
>for more accurate missile shots.
>
>***When considering the credibility of threatening speech, context is
>essential. Under the California laws at issue in this
>case, both the speaker's intent and his/her ability to carry out an
>apparent threat are considerations. Context makes it clear
>that Keith was joking. Common sense makes it clear that there was no
>genuine threat to the safety and well-being of any
>Scientologist; despite Keith's explosives expertise, discussed in great
>length below, it would be so difficult for Keith to obtain
>and launch an ICBM as to be virtually impossible.****
Given Keith's alleged knowledge of explosives and his alleged ability
to make explosive devices, *if* he had wanted to wreak any physical
destruction on a scientology facility or on a scientologist, he probably
would have already done so at some point in the years since 1995.
>An excerpt from another document printed from the site, shows the
>defendant stating that, "Killing the organization off entirely is the
>best way to change the future of Scientology". (This quote was taken
>from a document written by the defendant in April 1997, on the same
>Internet news group).
>
>***Note that this statement had been made THREE YEARS before the complaint
>was filed. During that time, Keith had, as stated in
>this report, picketed Scientology frequently; Keith made no threats and
>committed no incidents of violence. It is inconceivable that Scientology
>executives at Golden Era were unaware of the 1997
>post before June 2000. Why were they bringing it up now? As for the his
>comment about "killing the organization off entirely", he is clearly
>referring to the end of the organization, not to physical harm to any
>(much less all) individual Scientologists. Scientology has become so
>corrupt
>that some active Scientologists are also coming to believe that the
>destruction of the Scientology corporation is the best hope for the
>continuation of those parts of Scientology that they find beneficial.****
>
>Mr. Hoden informed that his students, and his employees are afraid of
>the defendant because he has also made threats in the past toward
>Church of Scientology.
>
>***That is simply false. To the extent that students and employees at
>Golden Era are afraid of Keith, it is because Scientology teaches them
>to be afraid of all critics of Scientology. The vast majority of Golden
>Era residents have no access to the internet and so would not have seen
>Keith's posts unless executives intentionally showed them to them. Because
>Scientology teaches Scientologists that critics are
>dangerous, individual Scientologists rarely talk to protestors (with the
>exception of OSA staffers, who "handle" protestors as part of their jobs).
>It is
>unlikely that students and employees would have had any idea who the
>protestor was unless their seniors told them.****
Keith also reported that some members were reading his signs and
waving at him, hardly the actions of someone who is afraid.
>He showed the deputy a copy of a deposition
>that the defendant was to attend with the church leader, David
>Miscavige, in May 1997. That document states an employee of Southwest
>Airlines, overhead threatening conversations between the defendant and
>another person. As a result, the deposition was deferred for
>Miscavige's safety, by a San Jose judge.
>
>***Once again, this is false. Under federal law, the Southwest employee
>would have been obligated to report Keith to airport authorities.
>No report was made - because the conversation mentioned here never took
>place. This is outrageous.****
>
>Another document shows another person on the Internet site, saying
>that GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) will not be needed as long as
>the defendant is standing on the hill providing IR (Infared)
>illumination for the missiles. Another document shows the defendant
>saying Miscavige has to "Watch for cruise missiles as well as eagles".
>
>***These are clearly jokes. The "cruise" missiles comment is a play on
>words, referring to celebrity Scientologists Tom Cruise. The notion of
>using attack eagles is simply ludicrous. A reasonable person (the usual
>standard by which threatening language is judged), reading these
>statements in context, would not construe them as threats.****
>
>As a result of the past contacts Mr. Hoden and his church have had
>with the defendant, he told the deputy they are all afraid of the
>defendant, because of his knowledge of missiles and explosives.
>
>***Again, this is false. Scientology executives either are afraid or
>pretend to be afraid of ALL critics. Scientology has tried to use the
>courts to stop numerous critics from picketing during the past five years;
>none of those critics had ever made any comments that could
>even be misconstrued as threats. Furthermore, numerous San Francisco Bay
>Area OSA staffers have had even more "contact" with Keith, since he
>pickets
>regularly in the Bay Area. He picketed in San Francisco less than two
>weeks before his sentencing date. Scientologists - at least half of whom
>knew
>who Keith was - walked with Keith and talked with him during his picket.
>They exhibited NO fear of Keith at all.****
>
>Mr.
>Hoden said that he, his employees, and students, have had to alter
>their day-to-day activities at the church, as a result of their fear.
>
>***While this may be true, it is not a reasonable fear and thus not one
>that Keith should bear the consequences of. As I've noted, Scientology
>teaches fear of ALL critics. Other critics have picketed at Golden Era
>without Keith; the Scientologists showed the same behavior, fleeing the
>picket signs. In particular, Bruce Pettycrew saw Scientologists retreat
>from an outdoor project at the appearance of his picket signs, leaving
>a wheelbarrow full of concrete to harden in the sun. Scientology has tried
>to stop Bruce from picketing in Mesa (near Phoenix), AZ, claiming he
>was shouting and disrupting them. Bruce does not shout when he pickets;
>traffic's too loud and fast in Mesa for that to make any sense.
>Scientology's
>attempt to use the courts to stop Bruce's pickets (based on alleged
>disruption, not alleged fear of Bruce) failed. Nevertheless, when Bruce
>appeared
>at Golden Era to peacefully picket, Scientologists fled. It has nothing to
>do with threats and everything to do with Scientology's deliberate
>creation of
>fear.****
>
>They are afraid to walk around the church when the defendant is
>outside protesting, because they fear he might be armed with some kind
>of explosive weapon.
>
>***To repeat: as demonstrated by their past behavior, they are afraid to
>walk around the church when
>ANYONE is outside protesting, because they are taught to be afraid.****
>
>
>
>
>Comments? Corrections? Suggestions?
>
>
>My thoughts are with you, Keith (and you, Arel!) (and all the good folks
>up in Canada!).
>
>Appalled,
>
>
>Kristi
In addition to mentioning that the "church" of scientology considers
the very existance of this newsgroup to be harassment, considers any
words spoken which they do not like to be harassment, and considers any
picketing, no matter how calm and peaceful, to be harassment, I have a
few comments below.
From Part 1:
>Gavina also showed documents that have pictures
>of the church in San Jacinto, with satellite coordinates, so that a
>missile could be accurately launched at the church.
The pictures that show Gold Base with satellite coordinates have been
on the net since long before Keith started picketing there. In fact,
some of these images reside on Microsoft's Terraserver, and are provided
by the US Geological Survey.
http://terraserver.homeadvisor.msn.com/image.asp?S=11&T=1&X=1253&Y=9358&Z=11&W=2
>The defendant was outside protesting when the deputy finished speaking
>to Mr. Hoden and Gavina. The deputy approached the defendant, detained
>him, and placed him in the back seat of his patrol vehicle. The
>defendant was transported to the Hemet Station for an interview.
>The defendant was Mirandized and questioned. He stated he does not
>like the Church of Scientology. He stated he sometimes says things on
>the site to make Miscavige "paranoid". He informed the deputy of his
>background with explosives. The defendant said he is a pyrotechnics
>expert and teaches pyrotechnics to eighth and ninth graders. The
>defendant said he has discussed ICBMs on the site, regarding the
>Church of Scientology, but only meant any comments as a joke. He
>informed he did not have any means of actually getting an ICBM.
>However, he stated again that he likes to say things to make Miscavige
>"paranoid".
>
>Under Penal Code 11418.5(a), a threat to use weapons of mass
>destruction, with! or without the intent or ability to carry out that
>threat, is a felony or misdemeanor. Mr. Hoden presented that Penal
>Code Section to the deputy and stated he feels it applies to him and
>the members of his church, based on the discussion of ICBMs and of the
>defendant's knowledge of explosives. Mr. Hoden refused to sign a
>Citizen's Arrest form to have the defendant arrested. The deputy
>forwarded the matter to the Detectives Unit for further investigation.
If Keith was such a threat, and Mr. Hoden amd his fellow
"parishioners" were afraid of Keith, why did Mr. Hoden refuse to sign
the Citizen's Arrest form to have Keith arrested?
>On July 22, 2000, a follow-up investigation was conducted. The
>reporting party, Ken Hoden, was recontacted. Mr. Hoden printed
>numerous e-mails reportedly sent from the defendant.
Reported by who? Why could Mr. Hoden not have printed these emails
*after* signing the Citizen's Arrest form, while Keith was being
detained, based on Mr. Hoden's citizen's arrest?
Emails sent from Keith to who? To Mr. Hoden? Where would Keith have
gotten Mr. Hoden's email address, if he even has one? If the emails
were not sent to Mr. Hoden, how did Mr. Hoden come into possesion of the
emails? I doubt many people, if any, inside Gold Base have access to
email. And isn't it a crime to snoop on other people's emails?
>On one occasion, on or about July 5, 2000, the defendant was
>"picketing" Golden Era Productions with a David Rice and Barbara Warr.
>Mr. Richardson and another retired LAPD officer, Frank Petty, were
>keeping close watch on all three as they were walking up and down the
>highway, which runs through the middle of Golden Era Productions'
>property. Rice had a Global Positioning System (GPS) and a compass.
>There were observed taking and writing down various coordinates of
>various buildings located on Golden Era Productions' property. Mr.
>Richardson was close enough to the three of them to hear what they
>were saying. The defendant and Rice discussed the coordinates and the
>defendant mentioned launching missiles.
Here is David Rice's affidavit concerning the GPS and the incident,
which seems to have been completely ignored:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=GPS+group:alt.religion.scientology&num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&scoring=r&rnum=15&ic=1&selm=3a53d4bc.18786074%40localhost
>At great expense to
>the church, Mr. Hoden has had their attorney hire two professional
>investigators to stay near the defendant to prevent him from trying to
>get over the fence onto church grounds and prevent the defendant from
>attempting to hurt church staff.
The "church" hires private investigators to watch a number of people
who have picketed and other high profile critics. The reason is not
their fear of violence, it is their fear of words and picket signs.
From Part 2:
>Mr. Abelson indicates the Church of Scientology takes the current
>matter very seriously. He relates that in 1996, in Portland, Oregon,
>there was an incident involving an Internet reader who had been making
>threats to the church. That individual entered, the church, and shot
>four members. Similarly, the defendant in the current matter made
>"threats" and "attacks" on the church via the Internet. Although Mr.
Where are these purported "threats" and "attacks" supposedly made by
Godeka on the internet?
The only people who have said that Jairus C. Godeka was on the
internet, and more specifically, on ars, are scientology spokespeople.
In fact, it was reported here that Elliot Ableson blamed ars for the
incident on TV in 1996:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%22%22Jairus+C.+Godeka%22%22+group:alt.religion.scientology&num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&scoring=r&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=tomklemDysAIw.907%40netcom.com
Furthermore, Keith reported that Hoden testified in court that Godeka
had shot Helen Burke, a pregnant scientologist, in the stomach, killing
her baby. The baby did not die, and it was reported by the Associated
Press that she was shot in the shoulder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%22%22Jairus+C.+Godeka%22%22+group:alt.religion.scientology&num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&scoring=r&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199610090042.RAA26122%40fat.doobie.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%22%22Shooting+and+Wheelchair+Can%27t+Stop+Her+Ministry+and+Motherhood%22%22+group:alt.religion.scientology&num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&scoring=r&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=623qcc%24r2c%241%40news2.voicenet.com
Even Helen Burke held no grudge against Godeka. Also, why were the
actual names omitted from the testimony?
>Abelson recognizes the defendant has a right to picket and exercise
>his First Amendment Rights, he does not have a right to "stalk" church
>buses and "yell" at staff members.
Then why, even when people picket without "stalking" church buses and
vehicles, and without yelling at, or even speaking to, staff members,
are they subjected to harassment intended to intimidate them into giving
up their constitutional rights to picket and speak, as has happened
around the world, in violation of US code, Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 13,
Sec. 241. Conspiracy Against Rights?
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/241.html
http://alley.ethercat.com/pickets/pktsind.htm
http://alley.ethercat.com/pickets/sp0000.htm