>Subject: Re: Keith is still in jail. You know the drill:
>From: Zenon Panoussis oracle@xs4all.nl
>Date: 5/31/01 9:04 PM Central
>Here, though, I disagree seriously. I think it takes much
>more than this to destroy Keith. He had his moral and his
>principles to begin with, but by now he has also been
>hardened. While he might have considered the prospective
>of bankruptcy to be a nightmare back in 1996, by now I
>suspect that scientology cannot destroy Keith even it
>would actually kill him. Destruction is relative namely,
>and one only suffers the destruction of what he values.
>Scientology made Keith grow to value his integrity more
>than his life. Well then, the only way to destroy such
>a person would be to corrupt him; not to jail him or kill
>him. And since I don't think I'll live to see the day that
>scientology manages to corrupt Keith, I consider this in
>itself to be yet another foot bullet for them. Had they
>pushed him less, they would have had a less fierce enemy
>now.
>
>Z
How much 'destruction' do you think Keith can take? Sure, he may not be 'corrupted' but meanwhile the scientology cult has bankrupted him, driven his family half way to madness and have driven him to a fugitive status. And all over some joking posts and picketing. They are getting away with it as they always seem to do. Is this much different from what the nazis and communists did? This will take some serious protesting to bring this to the attention of the public and they aren't going to give a damn. Let's be real. Jimdbb