The cult seems to be in a rush to spend that $350,000 they "expect to spend" on me per Rosen's notes, Exhibit 185 in the Lisa McPherson hearing.

But in the process of trying to deal with one of them, they trip over another--like they did in that attempt to get me arrested for failure to appear.

This is not interesting per se, but for its mention of yet another legal action, this time in front of Judge Ware. Now given the history involved, taking it before Judge Ware is particularly bone headed.

Why will be obvious to the Illuminated ones.

Keith Henson

Thomas R. Hogan, Esq., California State Bar No. 042048
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS R. HOGAN
Ten Almaden Boulevard, Suite 535
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 292-7600

HELENA K. KOBRIN, Esq., California State Bar No. 152546
MOXON & KOBRIN
3055 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90015 (213) 487-4468

Samuel D. Rosen, Esq.
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER
75 East 55th Street
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 318-6000

Attorneys for Plaintiff
RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, )
a California non-profit corporation; )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
H. KEITH HENSON, an individual )
)
Defendant. )
___________________________________ )

No. C-96 20271 RMW EAI

EX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT

Date: August 2, 2002
Time: 9:00 a.m. Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

Plaintiff Religious Technology Center ("RTC") does hereby move, ex parte, for an Order rescheduling the hearing on the Order to Show Cause Re Contempt ("OSC"), pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(b), 6-3 and 6-1(b).

RTC originally noticed a hearing for an OSC for August 2, 2002. RTC further sought, ex parte, an order shortening time to coordinate the OSC with related hearings before the bankruptcy court. This Court denied RTC's request for an Order shortening time and set the hearing as originally noticed.

Subsequent to Mr. Henson filing his opposition to the OSC, a hearing has been noticed before the Honorable James Ware on a related case for August 19, 2002. RTC now moves to have the two related matters be heard on consecutive dates in order to avoid incurring travel costs for two separate hearings.

In a telephone conversation between Mr. Hogan and Mr. Henson on Friday, July 12, 2002, Mr. Henson advised that he consented to the moving of the OSC hearing from August 2, 2002 to August 16, 2002. Local Rule 7-7(b) states that:

"When parties affected by the motion have not previously stipulated to continue the hearing date, . . ., the parties affected by the motion may stipulate in writing pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) to continue the hearing date."

In this case, although Mr. Henson has advised that he had no opposition to moving the hearing date from August 2, 2002 to August 16, 2002, a written stipulation was not obtained. Mr. Henson, as this court has been advised, currently resides in Canada. A copy of this ex parte motion is being e-mailed to Mr. Henson at an e-mail address he has designated in Canada.

Based upon the foregoing, RTC respectfully requests that this Court grant its ex parte motion and continue the hearing on the OSC to August 16, 2002.

Dated: __________ LAW OFFICES OF
THOMAS R. HOGAN

_____________________________________
THOMAS R. HOGAN
LESLIE HOLMES

Attorneys for Plaintiff