On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:24:59 -0500, "Christopher Wood" <cwood@NOSPAMxenu.ca> wrote:
>http://xenu.ca/court/1995scr2_1130.html
>
>Enjoy.
Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto [1995] 2 S.C.R. Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto 1130
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Morris Manning and the Church of Scientology of Toronto
Appellants
v.
S. Casey Hill
Respondent
and
The Attorney General for Ontario, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Writers' Union of Canada, PEN Canada, the Canadian Association of Journalists, the Periodical Writers Association of Canada, the Book and Periodical Council, the Canadian Daily Newspaper Association, the Canadian Community Newspapers Association, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters, the Radio-Television News Directors Association of Canada, the Canadian Book Publishers' Council and the Canadian Magazine Publishers' Association
Interveners
Indexed as: Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto
File No.: 24216.
1995: February 20; 1995: July 20.
snip
27 Patricia Felske is a Scientologist who had attended at the offices of the OPP on a regular basis since March 1983 for the purpose of reviewing the seized materials and ensuring that the privileged documents were sealed. Between August 29, 1984, and September 27, 1984, she, along with other representatives from Scientology, opened the sealed envelopes and verified their contents against photocopies of the documents that Rosemarie Drapkin had examined. Their purpose was to determine whether Ms. Drapkin had been granted access to the restricted materials.
snip
32 From the contents of the Felske Memorandum, which only came to light at the trial of the present action, it is evident that prior to the start of the contempt hearing, Scientology was well aware that no sealed envelopes had been opened. Yet, it still proceeded with a contempt prosecution against Casey Hill.
33 Morris Manning testified that he never received the Felske Memorandum and conceded that if he had been aware of it, he would have been obliged to disclose it to Casey Hill. However, on the weekend prior to the start of the contempt trial, Morris Manning was briefed by Charles Campbell. At trial, both Campbell and Ruby acknowledged that they had received the Felske Memorandum. In addition, Campbell testified that all important information concerning the prosecution was shared with everybody involved. It might be inferred that this would include Manning.
34 Further, Morris Manning met with Patricia Felske and two other representatives of Scientology during the weekend prior to the hearing of the contempt motion. However, he testified that they were not interviewed for the purpose of giving evidence at the contempt trial nor were they called to do so. Cromarty J. characterized the failure to call these individuals as "a most eloquent omission".
35 There was another equally eloquent omission. The OPP officers who were called by Scientology to testify were not asked to produce the sealed envelopes they were directed to bring with them to court. If they had, it would have been obvious that the envelopes had not been tampered with.
snip
Keith Henson