In article<41654f0a@news2.lightlink.com>, Rev. Desertphile de Rothschild
<desertphile@cchr.ws> writes:
>On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:47:21 +0200, "roger gonnet" <rg@antisectes.net>
>wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that since Moxon and c° did lose the
>> trials against Lisa McPherson, and that the crime
>> cult was forced to pay lots to the family, Moxon
>> does no longer appear publcily.
>
>I'm not convinced that a settlement with Ms. McPherson's
>estate would be considered a "loss" by the crime syndicate.
>I suspect the crime syndicate considers it a "win."
Agreed.
From my point of view, of course I wanted justice for the family, but my ideal would be "not just a large settlement but a public one, and most of all the scientology cult properly punished and humiliated for this act of manslaughter."
So I guess their priorities were just the opposite: humiliate the family and get the settlement as small as possible, but above all as secret as possible with minimum public embarrassment. So they think Moxon did good.
-- KENDRICK MORON: I did not deny his ruthlessness or efficiency. Honesty, decency, ethics, and humanity to the extent that he can barely be seen as part of the same species, yes. He is a sort of legal Gollum, except I doubt at the last he will have the integrity to bite Eugene Ingram's dick off & jump into a lava flow; I did not question his efficiency-DB :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Moxon was so shatteredBy his daughter's entirely unnecessary death that he took a few days off from harassing people over another woman's death the cult caused (Lisa McPherson) then went right back to it---------HKH