Scientology
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:50:02 -0700, Meklar@ix.netcom.com (Meklar) wrote:
> If you have proof that Laura Terepin is an OSA plant you need to
But several things happened that finally made it impossible for me to deny it
any longer.
There have been two women run in on me before her. Both followed the same
pattern she did. Both totally disappeared once they discovered they were
blown. Laura did the same thing.
There is no way ever to be one hundred percent sure that someone is an agent.
Any kind of evidence can be explained away. All I can say is that, to my
dismay, there were finally so many indications that she was an agent that I
very reluctantly had to conclude that she was.
Stacy Brooks
From: stacyb1@ix.netcom.com (Stacy Brooks)
Subject: Re: The enemy is amongst us!
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 05:53:19 GMT
Message-ID: <36ad19cd.20888227@news.newsguy.com>
>present it. If you have no evidence that she is a plant for OSA, at the
>very least you should apologize to her. At the most you have libeled
>her.
> In any case using the very same Dead Agent tatics that Scientology uses
>is distastefull. Pot........kettle.......black
This is not a matter of using dead agent tactics. I am the one Laura was run
in on. I was extremely unwilling to believe that Laura was an agent, because I
had come to consider her a very good friend and confidant and I was telling
her literally everything that was going on. I was presented with evidence that
was incontrovertible and still I refused to believe it. It was impossible for
me to believe that this person whom I had trusted so completely could really
be betraying me so terribly.