Scientology
ROBERT S. MINTON, JR.,
Respondent.
AMENDED TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
This cause coming on before the Court upon the Respondent's
Motion to Modify Temporary Injunction for Protection Against
Harassment and Violence and Respondent's Petition For Temporary
Injunction. The hearing in the matter was held on the 29th' day
of November 1999. Both parties were present, together with
their attorneys of record. The Respondent, ROBERT S. MINTON,
JR. (hereinafter the "Respondent"), requested that the Court
modify the temporary injunction issued in this cause on
November 4, 1999.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On November 4, 1999, the Petitioner, RICHARD W. HOWD, JR.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Petitioner"), filed his
Petition for Injunction Prohibiting Harassment and Violence and
on that same date obtained an ex parte Temporary Injunction
against the Respondent. ordering the Respondent to refrain from
committing any acts of violence against the Petitioner or any
staff member or parishioner of the Church of Scientology Flag
Service Organization or its facilities in Pinellas County, to
stay away from these same persons, and to stay at least 150
yards away from 17 specified locations owned or leased by the
Church of Scientology in the City of Cleanwater, Florida.
This Court, at a hearing in this cause on November 15, 1999,
extended the time for the temporary injunction to remain in
effect to permit the Respondent to make his response to the
petition.
On October 31, 1999, the Respondent was picketing in front of
the Ft. Harrison Hotel, Clearwater, Florida, which is the
headquarters of The Church of Scientology Flag Service
Organization, a not?for?profit religious organization
(hereinafter referred to as "Scientology"; members of this
organization shall hereinafter be referred to as
"Scientologists"). As Respondent walked back and forth in front
of the hotel, Petitioner, who is a Scientologist and a member
of the Security Force for the hotel, came outside and began
videotaping Respondent. Petitioner proceeded to close in on the
Respondent and ultimately was within a matter of a few feet
from the Respondent as he picketed. Ultimately, an altercation
occurred between the Petitioner and the Respondent. The
Petitioner was struck in the face with the sign that Respondent
was carrying. On November 1, 1999, the Respondent was charged
by the Clearwater Police Department with assault and battery.
Evidence presented showed that the Respondent had been involved
in a prior altercation with a Scientologist while picketing in
front of Scientologist property in Boston, Massachusetts.
Respondent was arrested and charged with assault and battery by
means of a dangerous weapon by? the Boston police. As a result
of this arrest and court proceedings, a "stay?away order" was
issued against the Respondent by the Boston court.
Additional evidence showed that there had been other
altercations between Scientologists and the Respondent at other
Scientologist locations throughout the country.
The Petitioner introduced these videotapes to show Respondent's
violent propensities.
However, these same videotapes clearly showed that as
Respondent picketed in front of the various Scientology
properties, Scientology members would close within I to 2 feet
of the Respondent and the two would get "in the face" of the
other. They engaged in a type of "picket chicken".
Unfortunately, when these confrontations took place, violence
usually ensued.
As a result of the confrontation and violence between the
parties here in Pinellas County, Florida, this Court enjoined
Respondent from going within 150 yards of 17 different
Scientology locations in the county.
LAW
Injunctive relief should be no more burdensome to the
Respondent than necessary to provide complete relief to the
Petitioner. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc., 512 U.S. 753
(1994); Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682 (1979).
In drafting orders ?of injunctions, "precision of regulation"
is demanded. NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963).
Parties seeking injunctions assert a violation of their rights;
the Court hearing the action is charged with fashioning a
remedy for a specific deprivation, not with the drafting of a
statute addressed to the general public. Madsen.
In public debate, citizens must tolerate insulting, and even
outrageous, speech in order to provide adequate breathing space
to the freedoms protected by the First Amendment. Boos v.
Barry, 485 U.S. 312 (1988).
In drafting an injunction, the Court must take into
consideration the state's strong interest in ensuring the
public safety and order. The Court must consider such things as
promoting the free flow of traffic on public streets and
sidewalks, and the protection of property rights of all
citizens. Madsen.
Injunctions in the State of Florida shall be binding on the
parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants,
employees, and attorneys and on those persons in active concert
or participation with them who receive actual notice of the
injunction. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610; Channell v. Applied Research,
Inc., 472 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1985); Dad's Properties,
Inc. v. Lucas, 545 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989; Xavier J
Fernandez, P.A. v. Sun Bank of Tampa Bay, 670 So. 2d 1106 (Fla.
2d DCA 1996).
CONCLUSIONS
The initial Temporary Injunction entered by this Court is too
broad and overbearing. The First Amendment rights of the
Respondent are too limited.
The requirement that the Respondent has to stay 150 yards away
from the specified 17 Scientology sites in Pinellas County must
be modified.
Inasmuch as BOTH the Petitioner and the Respondent have engaged
in the dangerous and threatening practice of seeing how close
one can get to the other while each is exercising his
respective constitutional rights, BOTH parties must be mutually
restrained. The record shows that this practice of "picket
chicken" has resulted in injuries when one of the participants
makes an abrupt stop or sudden turn. Tempers have flared as a
result of this gamesmanship. Although Respondent has been twice
charged with violent acts against two different Scientologists.
in two different states, the record shows that each incident
evolved out of a session of "picket chicken".
It is quite simple. Two people while exercising their
constitutional right of free speech. cannot physically occupy
the same amount of space without a touching or tempers flaring
AFTER hearing all of the testimony, viewing all of the
evidence, reading the recitations, the briefs and the cases
submitted,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. An immediate Amended Temporary Injunction is entered against
the Respondent, ROBERT S. MINTON, JR., enjoining him from
committing any acts of harassment or violence against
Petitioner, RICHARD W. HOWD, JR., any staff member or
parishioner of the Church of Scientology Flag Service
Organization or its facilities in Pinellas County, Florida.
2. Respondent, ROBERT S. MINTON, JR., must stay at least 10
feet away from any Scientology property in Pinellas County
hereinafter set forth in paragraph #7 below.
3. The provisions of paragraphs #1 and #2 shall be binding on
the Respondent, his officers, agents, servants, employees, and
on those persons in actual concert or participation with him
who receive actual notice of this injunction.
4. An immediate Temporary Injunction is entered against
Petitioner, RICHARD W. HOWD, JR., enjoining him from committing
any acts of harassment or violence against Respondent, ROBERT
S. MINTON, JR.
5. Petitioner, RICHARD W. HOWD, JR. must stay at least 20 feet
away from Respondent, ROBERT S. MINTON, JR., at all times when
Respondent is abiding by the terms of paragraphs #1 and #2
above.
6. The provisions of paragraphs #4 and #5 shall be binding on
Petitioner, Richard W. HOWD, JR., his officers, agents,
servants, employees, and on those persons in active concert or
participation with him who receive actual notice of this
injunction.
7. The 17 locations of real property owned or leased by the
Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization to which
Respondent, ROBERT S. MINTON, JR., must stay at least 10 feet
away from as set forth in paragraph #2 above are as follows:
1.Fort Harrison Hotel, 210 South Ft. Harrison Avenue, Clearwater,
2. Sandcastle Building, 200 North Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL;
3. West Coast Building, 1118 North Ft. Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, FL;
4. Coachman Building, 500 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL
5. Clearwater Bank Building, 503 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL;
6. Hacienda Gardens, 551 Saturn Avenue, Clearwater, FL;
7. Yachtsman, 1024 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL;
8. Quality Inn, 16432 U. S. Highway 19 North, Clearwater, FL;
9. Mariner Hotel, 711 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL;
10. Bayside Student Motels, 1840 North Ft. Harrison Avenue, Clearwater,
11. Clipper Student Motel, 1850 North Ft. Harrison Avenue, Clearwater,
12. Tradewinds Student Motel, 1824 North Ft. Harrison Avenue,Clearwater,
13. Osceola Inn, 211 N. Osceola, Clearwater, FL;
14. Burnside Building, 309 Garden Street, Clearwater, FL;
15. Auxiliary Building, 109 North Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, FL;
16. Student College, 531 Franklin Street, Clearwater, FL; and
17. Site of the former Graymoss Hotel in downtown Clearwater,
FL, Ft. Harrison to the West, Pierce Street to the North,
Garden Street to the East and Franklin Street to the South.
8. This AMENDED TEMPORARY INJUNCTION shall be in full force and
effect for 180 days from this the 2nd day of December, 1999, or
as modified by further order of this Court.
9. Any violation hereof shall constitute contempt of court,
punishable by fine or imprisonment.
10. No bond shall be required for the issuance of this
Amended Temporary Injunction since the injunction is issued
solely to prevent the physical injury, harassment, or abuse of
natural persons.
11. The Clerk of Court shall immediately return to
Petitioner, RICHARD W. HOWD, JR., the $ 1,000. 00 bond he
previously posted with the Court in this cause.
12. This injunction is valid and enforceable in all counties
of the State of Florida.
13. Any sworn law enforcement officer may assist in the
execution or service of this injunction.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at St. Petersburg, Pinellas
County, Florida, this
2nd day of December, 1999
Signed Thomas E. Penick, Jr.
CIRCUIT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
Richard W. Howd, Jr., Petitioner
Robert S. Minton, Jr., Respondent
Paul B. Johnson, Esquire
Michael L. Hertzberg, Esquire
Denis M. deVlaming, Esquire
Douglas M. deVlaming, Esquire
Bruce G. Howie, Esquire
From: Bob Minton <bob@minton.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:25:18 -0500
Organization: The Lisa McPherson Trust, Inc., Clearwater, Florida
Message-ID: <69hl5sk1ljnb1jtld1j6ovk414p3rijo16@4ax.com>
Reply-To: bob@minton.org
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIRCUIT CIVIL NO. 99?7430?CI?8
RICHARD W. HOWD, JR.,
Petitioner,
VS.