Scientology
St. Petersburg Times, published December 8, 1999
Which is the real Church of Scientology?
Is it the apparently reasonable group whose relationship with
the city of Clearwater is evolving into one of acceptance and
cooperation? Or is it the litigious force that clings to a
secretive, malevolent image?
In the past two weeks, Clearwater residents have seen both
sides of the Church of Scientology.
For the first time, some business people spoke of
Scientologists as an asset in downtown Clearwater rather than
as a liability.
Five developers submitted ambitious plans for downtown
redevelopment, proposing movie theaters, shops and public
improvements worth millions of dollars. The sleepy downtown
with a controversial religious presence is worth the risk
because thousands of residents and tourists with money to spend
form a ready market, developers said.
They even used a Scientology report that says 1,000 church
members, many wealthy, visit downtown Clearwater each month.
"We viewed it as a potential positive," said Jay Miller of
Steiner +
Associates, one of the developers.
The church also hired the prominent Clearwater law firm Johnson
Blakely Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns to handle local issues. The
lead attorney on the account, Ed Armstrong, will be chairman of
the Clearwater Area Chamber of Commerce next year. Some saw the
arrangement as a sign that the Church of Scientology has
achieved a new level of acceptance in the business community.
But the church soon embroiled itself in a new controversy.
Robert Minton, a wealthy New Englander, showed up in Clearwater
to lead a vigil for Lisa McPherson, a Scientologist who died in
the custody of church members. The church faces criminal
charges of abusing a disabled adult and practicing medicine
without a license.
Scientologists followed Minton and videotaped his every move, a
tactic labeled "picket chicken" by a judge. Minton was charged
with striking a church member, and the church hauled him to
court where a judge ordered the activist to maintain a 10-foot
distance from Scientology's 17 buildings.
Then, in a childish display, Scientologists painted orange dots
on city sidewalks marking a 10-foot zone around the church's
buildings. The church also tore up sidewalks in front of its
Fort Harrison Hotel as part of a project whose timing appears
to be no accident.
In its effort to intimidate Minton and his followers and to
limit their right to peaceful protest, the church showed it
will spare no expense to silence its critics. By its
overreaction, the church drew attention to an otherwise
uneventful protest and motivated Minton to further action. He
vows to establish a permanent presence in Clearwater, offering
defecting Scientologists and critics a "safe zone."
It is his right. But constant ideological battles in courtrooms
and on downtown sidewalks can only damage Clearwater's image.
So which Church of Scientology is building an ever greater
presence in downtown Clearwater?
Is it the one that can be seen as an asset in the redevelopment
effort? Or is it the one that continues to draw adverse
publicity to a city that has suffered enough turmoil?
Only the highest Scientology officials can answer those
questions. All of Clearwater will be waiting and watching their
actions.
No matter how much money the Church of Scientology brings to
downtown Clearwater, it will be impossible for it to be an
asset if it cannot control its harmful behavior.
A Times Editorial