Scientology
I had looked forward to my recent trip to Leipzig for the presentation of the
second annual Human Rights Award, expecting that it would be an opportunity to
meet with many old friends. Instead, members of the Lisa McPherson Trust and I
were viciously attacked by both Patricia Greenway and Ursula Caberta. The
behavior displayed by these two was appalling to all of us.
In Patricia Greenway's case, this is not new. From the time I established the
LMT, she has made it a point to go after David Cecere, Stacy Brooks, Jesse
Prince, and Heather Bennett that I know of. It seemed to me that Patricia had
a bias against ex-Scientologists and particularly against people who had been
in the Sea Org. In Heather's case, first Patricia tried to use Heather as a
conduit for information about the LMT and when Heather refused to do it,
Patricia turned on her viciously. As recently as a few weeks ago, Patricia was
still attacking Heather in a private chat channel, and she brought her up to
me in a derogatory manner in Leipzig.
Teresa Summers, also ex-Sea Org, is another LMT staff member that Patricia has
tried to use as a source of information. Teresa has also refused to allow
herself to be used in this way.
Stacy and I have both tried over the past year to keep our rift with Patricia
quiet, hoping that it would slowly mend itself. I was particularly torn on this
matter due to my very positive personal feelings for Peter Alexander,
Patricia's partner. Unfortunately, time has only exacerbated the negativity of
Patricia's behavior towards the entire LMT team. Now, after the events that
occurred in Leipzig, I think it is time to make it known that Patricia has been
the most destructive force the LMT has had to contend with since soon after we
opened the doors. She has spoken disparagingly about Stacy and others at the
LMT and I have had to intervene to ask her to stop several times. Each time she
has denied that she had said anything critical at all. During one of these
times Patricia told Stacy that the reason people were coming to Stacy to tell
her that Patricia was saying bad things was that they were afraid to tell her
they felt that way themselves, so they were attributing it to Patricia.
I asked Peter and Patricia to stay in Europe and go to Leipzig to show our
film, "The Profit." In fact, I did not even go to Cannes for the film's debut
in order to avoid any scenes between Patricia and Stacy, and I told Patricia
that her behavior had taken the fun out of the movie for me. I expected
Patricia to concentrate on the film and leave her animosity for Stacy and the
LMT aside while in Leipzig. Patricia has been actively and continuously trying
to drive a wedge between Stacy and me. While in Leipzig, I received a report
from Mark Bunker that Patricia spent an hour with him on Saturday afternoon
repeating her vitriolic criticism of Stacy.
On Monday afternoon Stacy and I had an encounter with Patricia, Peter
and Ursula Caberta. Up until that moment neither of us had any idea that
Ursula was anything but our good friend. Stacy and I have stood by her through
many difficulties, both personal and professional and have always trusted her
as a friend. But in this encounter Peter said Ursula had told him that Stacy
had told Ursula not to help them with the movie. I knew this wasn't true
because I had been there when Stacy was telling Ursula what needed to be done
on the film. Ursula backpedaled on this, saying she just got this idea but
Stacy had never actually said it. In fact, Ursula called Stacy several times to
complain to her about Patricia and Peter's lack of professionalism in
scheduling showings of the film. But this encounter degenerated into an
appalling performance by Patricia, in which she ranted that Stacy was the most
evil human being in the world and that Stacy was totally controlling me. I
tried to tell her this was not the case, at which point Patricia accused me of
not being willing to listen to anyone about Stacy, saying that "everyone" knows
what Stacy is doing except me, and this kind of thing. I tried to return our
relationship to a professional level but Patricia made it impossible.
Later that night Teresa confided in Stacy that the night before, on Sunday
night, Ursula and Patricia both sat down with her and spent several hours
deliberately trying to turn her against me, Stacy and the LMT. Teresa wrote a
report about what these two said to her. It is appalling.
Being betrayed by faux-friends has been disappointing for me, for Stacy, for
Mark and for Teresa. The LMT is a very tight-knit group, and for Patricia and
Ursula to engage in this kind of undermining of the work we are doing is really
incredible to me. There is only one group that benefits from sowing this type
of discord within the ranks of the LMT, and that is Scientology. I don't know
if Patricia and Ursula are unwitting victims or are actually cooperating with
OSA, but they are forwarding OSA's agenda without any question.
After these recent experiences I don't trust either one of them as far as I can
spit.
Bob Minton
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:47:30 +0200, ©Anti-Cult® -
www.users.wineasy.se/noname/ <Anti-Cult@galacticfederation.homeip.net>
wrote:
>>Bob Minton <bobminton@lisatrust.net> wrote:
>>appalling performance by Patricia, in which she ranted that Stacy was the
I have observed Bob and Stacy's interactions at close range. It is
true that Stacy *tries* to influence Bob in directions which are
without a doubt good ones. She has tried to influence me in exactly
the same directions--with roughly the same (low) level of success.
Both of us would likely be better off taking more of her advice than
we do.
snip
>>Patricia and Ursula to engage in this kind of undermining of the work we
Bob, my experience is no deeper than yours on these subjects, but I do
have a lot of bleeding edge EP theory to help guide me. These kinds
of squabbles and jockeying for social position go on all the time in
tribes, the prototype human organization larger than a family.
Tearing leaders down is a time honored way to rise in status--if it
suscceded--and a way to drop in status or be banished if it fails.
The very independent and fractious traits that make people valuable
contributors to the ARSCC's goals makes them more damaging when they
get into these primate power contests.. (Fill in examples here.)
There may be a sex bias in these traits as well since no matter how
bad the internal fighting got between the men, they had to make
afterwards to defend the tribe or they all died. (See the incredible
tale in Chimpanzee Politics.)
The problem is that almost nobody is aware they are running programs
worked into their genes over a million years of (genetic) life and
death struggles for social position in tribes and small villages.
Sorry for the lecture, we now return to the regular soap opera in
progress. :-)
Keith Henson
PS Tim Leary understood and wrote about this subject long before the
underlying theory was worked out.
From: Bob Minton <bobminton@lisatrust.net>
Subject: Greenway and Caberta, OSA pawns?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:38:17 -0400
Organization: Lisa McPherson Trust, 33 N. Fort Harrison Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: (727) 467-9335
Message-ID: <4l0tit4bh2nnilgkdh02l5ukf7cnl28045@4ax.com>
From: elrond1@home.com (Gregg)
Subject: Re: Greenway and Caberta, OSA pawns?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:58:27 GMT
Organization: Temple of At'L'An
Message-ID: <3b2f5bdb.52263982@news2.lightlink.com>
>>most evil human being in the world and that Stacy was totally controlling
>>me. I tried to tell her this was not the case, at which point Patricia
>>accused me of not being willing to listen to anyone about Stacy, saying
>>that "everyone" knows what Stacy is doing except me, and this kind of
>>are doing is really incredible to me. There is only one group that
>>benefits from sowing this type of discord within the ranks of the LMT, and
>>that is Scientology. I don't know if Patricia and Ursula are unwitting
>>victims or are actually cooperating with OSA, but they are forwarding
>>OSA's agenda without any question.