-
Subject: Re: Minton's children missing?
From: Deana Holmes <mirele@sonic.net>
Organization: Scientology Killed Lisa McPherson
Message-ID: <Xns91F774A22EE12mirelesonicnet@208.201.224.154>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:24:58 GMT
Patrick J. Volk <pvolk6@attbi.com> wrote in news:bvu5cu0q7a063dshlfclf117capdvs49g3@4ax.com:
> 3) Clean exit - Minton's throwing around of money might have attracted
> some hangers-on. They hoped, or demanded on being kept for an
> indefinite period. The whole LMT-Minton thing strikes me in this kind
> of light.
Given Bob's statements about money to the court on Friday (as reported in the press), I would like to suggest 4: Scientology is buying him out. Please keep in mind this is just my theory and all I am basing it on is Bob's statements about money.
4) Scientology has offered to buy up all of Minton's "loans", etc., and pay him off (basically giving him his money back). In exchange for this, Bob tells them everything. What does Scientology get? (a) they get rid of Bob Minton, (b) they get a lot of info about their enemies and (c) they have a leverage point in litigation. For example: If Bob were to sell off his non- recourse loan to the Estate to Scientology, that would give Scientology a legal lever (albeit a slim one, because it is a non-recourse loan) to harass the Estate. Since the purpose of the lawsuit is to harass, and Scn has had great successes :( with harassment lawsuits in the past, I could see this.
Deana M. Holmes
mirele@sonic.net
