Scientology
On 20 May 2002 19:40:46 GMT, jimdbb@aol.com (JimDBB) wrote:
>Mark:
Jim, I appreciate that people have questions.
If you read Stacy's testimony on what brought Bob and Stacy to the
position they are in you will see exactly what has happened.
Bob got in a hell of a legal jam trying to avoid questions that
probably never should have been allowed to have been asked to begin
with.
The case was turned into a case about Bob Minton and not Lisa
McPherson. The judge is saying now what I have been saying all
along...who cares how much money Bob gave to the estate? Who cares if
the estate was going to give a large chunk of the money to an
anti-cult group?
However, Ken panicked and said, "Listen we have to backtrack on this."
Why on earth would Bob Minton announce in public that the estate was
going to donate money to an anti-cult group if that wasn't the case?
Wouldn't they say, "What the hell are you talking about? We aren't
going to do that."
Instead, Bob and the family all had testified that was the case and
when Ken panicked he convinced them all to write affidavits that were
knowingly false.
No one wants to confront the testimony that shows that to be true. No
one wants to confront the fact that Dandar was demanding Bob hide the
other $750,000 given to the case and to continue lying about that when
Bob had to face a trial for contempt..
Bob was under relentless pressure from ALL sides. Not only was
Scientology attacking, but so were "his friends."
Bob was isolated from friends and family by Scientology and isolated
from the critical community by the relentless attacks from people such
as Deana who is the official voice for the family of Lisa McPherson on
the web and claims to be the sole owner of open court records supplied
to her from Dandar's office.
At the same time, he is being hounded about not giving MORE than 1.3
million dollars to the case, Bob knows he's already given another
$500,000 on top of that and for his trouble he has been put in
terrible jeopardy.
Meanwhile. he is being called by a desperate Dandar who is begging
for even more money while the onslaught of legal attacks from
Scientology, vicious attacks from friends and pressure from Schaeffer
and Baird's courtrooms continues to build. As painful as it was for
Bob to do, he agreed to give one last check to get the case to trial
because he did want justice for Lisa and all he asked was for Ken to
make the people who interface with him to just SHUT THE HELL UP!.
I don't blame him. I have never for a moment thought about stopping
my work due to anything Scientology has done to me but I am so sick
and tired of the crap that goes on in the "critic community" that I am
about ready to walk away because of it.
I don't wish ill will on Ken but he's not the saint that people
believe him to be nor is Bob the devil he is being painted to be. Ken
should have stopped being so greedy and brought in one of those firms
that offered to help instead of relying solely on Bob to get him to
trial.
He should have thought about his client before his bank account. My
god, wasn't anyone else horrified when Dell was on the stand and she
testified she didn't even realise she would be held liable if she lost
the counter claim? Is Ken really acting in the best interests of his
client?
Bob's attorney told him to tell the truth. Bob did.
"As for credibility, mine disappeared a long time ago..." ---- Tigger
"In fact, I suspect (hell, I KNOW) Mark is being used as a tool by Scientology" ---- Deana M. Holmes
From: Mark Bunker <xenutv@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Mark Bunker please stop forward.
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:37:48 -0400
Organization: LMT Media
Message-ID: <rmmieu0hslgv0i0lom3orqavhsjn483ag9@4ax.com>
>
> A number of people and myself have asked you to put aside the cute remarks and
>comments and stop forward with solid information on the recent events.
>
>You worked closely with Bob MInton and Stacy Brooks. Your superb work as a
>film-video documentarian has played an important role in exposing the crimes
>and frauds perpetrated by the Church of Scientology. With the talent that you
>have displayed I don't think that you will ever lack for substandtial work in
>the world of film and video.
>
> Many of us on the ARS, Mark, are confused and in dismay over the recent
>actions of Bob and Stacy. I ask you to give us your viewpoint on what is
>taking place. I'm not asking you to disclose anything confidential or
>inappropriate, just your overview on what is going on.
>
>thank you,
>
>Jim Beebe