Subject: Re: Weird attack on Schaeffer
Organization: CitizensAgainstCorruption
Message-ID: <3ceaf2ec.34354757@news.verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 01:28:23 GMT
On Tue, 21 May 2002 19:19:18 -0400, ptsc <ptsc AT nym DOT cryptofortress DOT com> wrote:
>Why on Earth did the St. Petersburg Times suddenly reissue
>a story on Judge Schaeffer right now, of all times? Scientology
>has just "persuaded" two former critics, Bob Minton and Stacy
>Brooks, to turn traitor, and to spew perjury.
>
>http://www.operatingthetan.com/bob/ has the perjuries.
>
>Judge Schaeffer is not seeming at all happy with this attempted
>perversion of justice, and has expressed displeasure from the
>bench.
>
>Suddenly, Judge Schaeffer is attacked by the St. Petersburg Times
>in an article about another Judge, Judge Cope. It accuses her of
>having "conspired" with Judge Cope not to report an arrest of Judge
>Cope for an alleged lurid crime in California. However, if she was
>not obligated to report this crime (that was already being handled
>by the police), she could not have "conspired" to do anything at all.
>You can only "conspire" to do something illegal. The SP Times
>is skirting libel pretty narrowly (and for what?).
>
>That's this story.
>http://www.sptimes.com/2002/05/21/Opinion/Court_needs_better_ju.shtml
>
>The funny thing is this identical story has already appeared twice, over
>a year ago. Why suddenly report it again now as if it's news?
>
>http://www.stpetersburgtimes.com/News/071601/Columns/Snooty_robes_in_Pinel.shtml
>http://www.festivalofreading.com/News/020801/TampaBay/Circuit_judges_elect_.shtml
>are two previous stories mentioning this case.
>
>I don't see anything new or exciting in the latest version of it, so why is this
>"news" again? I smell bullshit, and bullshit smells like OSA.
>
>ptsc
heh... i didnt know about the previous version of that....
till I read yer posting here is a letter to the SP Times I sent off this morning:
Black Helicopters in Clearwater?
I suppose that's a good enough phrase for extreme paranoia, eh?
Concerning the Editorial mentioning Judge Shaeffer...
Who is in the midst of piloting a floating garbage scow called the Lisa McPherson case through dire straits, during a typhoon of recant, accusation and discovery abuse into a very tight port called 'Justice' that appears to still be over the horizon.
Seeing that the Minton / Brooks / Dandar debacle has failed to derail the Lisa Mcpherson case, I would expect the Scientologists might target judge Shaeffer.
Perhaps in anticipation of an adverse ruling, perhaps because Bob Minton was taking the stand yesterday, and Judge Shaeffer was, of course, feeling quite short with folks in general, I'm sure, after reading your editorial.
Was there anything odd about the timing of this 'editorial'? How long has this 'editorial' been sitting in a desk drawer? Who at the St.
Pete times decided to run this that day? Who were the sources for the information used for this anonymous 'editorial'.
It wouldn't have been, one of many private investigators employed by my favorite Orwellian cult of deception, would it?
and no, there have been no sightings of black helicopters here....
but thanks for your interest
Arnie Lerma
http://www.lermanet.com
Citizens Against Corruption
6045 N 26th Road
Arlington Virginia 22207
703 241 1498
Ferengi + Borg = Scientology
I'd prefer to die speaking my mind than live fearing to speak.
The only thing that always works in scientology are its lawyers
The internet is the liberty tree of the new millennium
Secrets are the mortar binding lies as bricks together into prisons for the mind
http://www.lermanet.com/grifters.htm - mentioned 4 January 2000 in
The Washington Post's - 'Reliable Source' column re "Scientologist with no HEAD"
You want Bigots? http://members.cox.net/bwarr2/Movie2.html
