(Semi-corrected OCR)
IN RE: ESTATE OF
File No. 97-0589-ES
LISA McPHERSON Deceased.
Division: 003
_______________________________________/
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM
ROBERT S. MINTON ("MINTON"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby
requests that this Court appoint an administrator ad litem for the purpose
of taking charge of all pending litigation for which the Estate is presently
engaged, and in support therefore, states as follows:
1. MINTON made a series of loans to the Estate for the express purpose
of funding litigation expenses relating to the decedent's wrongful death;
and as such, is a creditor and an "interested person" pursuant to Rule
5.120, Fla. Probate Rules.
2. The MINTON loans, which remain unpaid, were to be satisfied through
potential recoveries from the wrongful death action prosecuted by the duly
appointed personal representative, DELL LIEBREICH. It is now evident,
however, after five years of service, that the personal representative is
severely mishandling the Estate litigation, thereby jeopardizing MINTON's
interest in being repaid his loans if an administrator ad litem is not
immediately appointed to take over the course of said litigation.
3. Moreover, in December 1997, the Estate, through the personal
representative and counsel, agreed with MINTON that the Estate would
distribute a substantial portion of any recovery from the wrongful death
action to an organization controlled by MINTON. In sworn deposition
testimony given in 1999, the personal representative, in the presence of the
Estates counsel, confirmed the existence of that agreement with MINT ON.
Also in 1999, each of the personal representative's siblings, who are also
beneficiaries of the Estate, similarly confirmed the existence of that
agreement with MINTON, again in the presence of the Estate's counsel. [n
April 2002, the personal representative again testified that this agreement
with MINTON existed, but stated that she had "changed her mind" about it.
The personal representative's recent testimony that she intended to renege
on the agreement with MINTON is a further basis to believe that the personal
representative is acting in contradiction to her duties to preserve the
Estate's assets for the benefit of interested person MINTON, while
continuing to squander the funds he has invested in the Estate's litigation.
4. The personal representative, instead of maximizing recoveries as is
her charge, has caused through her actions multiple judgments to be entered
against the Estate for breaching a covenant not to sue certain entities and
individuals. One such judgment in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas totals over $500,000. In addition, counsel
retained by the personal representative was personally sanctioned nearly
$100,000 for conducting frivolous and vexatious litigation.
5. Judge Baird recently entered another judgment for liability against
the Estate in a related breach of contract action filed in the Circuit Court
of the Sixth Judicial District for Pinellas County, Florida. The damages and
attorneys' fees claimed are expected to exceed $600,000. The Estate and its
attorneys were further sanctioned by the court in the amount of $l1,824.26.
6. In the wrongful death action currently pending in the Pinellas
County Circuit Court, there is a motion, which Judge Schaeffer presently has
under submission, to dismiss the action and to disqualify the personal
representative's counsel for allegedly suborning perjury and for the filing
and prosecution of a sham pleading. In that case, there has been a
counterclaim asserted against the Estate that is tantamount to "abuse of
process." Said counterclaim has already withstood the Estate's motion to
dismiss and therefore must be viewed as another potential Estate liability
unless corrective action is instituted.
7. Florida Probate Rule 5.120(a) expressly provides for the appointment
of an administrator ad litem where the "necessity arises..." In this instant
matter, it is absolutely imperative that an independent and objective
administrator ad litem be appointed to take over all pending litigation, as
it is readily apparent from the record that the personal representative is
not acting in the best interests of the Estate in prosecuting the wrongful
death litigation to maximize a recovery, and if she is permitted to continue
in this capacity, her direction will likely create more liabilities.
8. The personal representative has also recently filed a First
Accounting that causes MINTON great concern. Among other things, the
personal representative failed to account for the MINTON loans, nor did she
disclose any Estate assets on hand (not even the wrongful death action). The
First Accounting contains many other serious and significant material
defects, deficiencies, errors and omissions and potentially discloses
improper conduct with respect to the personal representative and/or her
counsel. MINTON has filed an objection to the First Accounting with this
Court and hereby incorporates said objection herein by reference.
9. Moreover, after receiving the wholly deficient First Accounting,
MINTON made a statutory request for a copy of the probate inventory, but for
some unknown reason was denied said request by the Estate. MINTON thus filed
with this Court a motion to compel a copy of the inventory and hereby
incorporates said motion herein by reference.
10. It appears that the personal representative and her counsel are
acting to conceal assets of the Estate. They have most recently concocted a
story, presumably in order to skirt the probate court's control and
jurisdiction, that the MINTON loans were not made to the Estate, but were
"personal" loans to the Estate lawyer to use for whatever purpose he
chooses including personal matters. This new found position of the personal
representative is directly in contradiction of her duty to preserve Estate
assets for the benefit of interested persons, including creditors such as
MINTON.
11. Further creating an adversarial interest is the fact that the
personal representative and her siblings are the beneficiaries of the
Estate. Florida Probate Rule 5.120(a) authorizes the appointment of an
administrator ad litem where the personal representative is also a survivor
of the decedent and therefore may have an adverse interest to the Estate.
See Continental National Bank v. Brill, 636 So. 2d 782, 783-4 (Fla. 3d DCA
1994) (in such a case, the court may appoint an individual without self-
interest as administrator ad litem).
12. Based upon the forgoing, MINTON believes that the personal
representative is properly administering the Estate, wasting assets of the
Estate, acting in contravention of law and equity, promoting the interests
of beneficiaries and others above the rights and interests of other
interested persons such as MINTON, all of which rises to the level that
requires this Court to immediately appoint an administrator ad litem.
WHEREFORE, ROBERT S. MINTON would respectfully request that this Court
immediately appoint an administrator ad litem for the purpose of taking
charge of all pending litigation for which the Estate is presently engaged,
and for such other and further relief that this Honorable Court deems
appropriate under the circumstances.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has
been furnished by U.S. Mail to:
F. WALLACE POPE, SR., ESQUIRE, Johnson, Blakely, et al.,
P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, Florida 33757-1368;
KENNAN G. DANDAR, ESQUIRE, Dandar & Dandar, P.A.,
P.O. Box 24597, Tampa, Florida 33623-4597
and WILLIAM RAMIBAUM, ESQUIRE,
28960 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 100, Clearwater, Florida 33761,
this day of September, 2002.
Fla. Bar No. 4173 SPN 1923
STEPHEN J. WEIN, ESQUIRE
Fla. Bar No. 212814 SPN 43400
BATTAGLLIA, ROSS, DICUS & WEIN, P.A.
P.O. Box 41100
St. Petersburg, Florida 33743-1100
Telephone No. (727) 381-2300
Facsimile No. (727) 343-4059
ATTORNEYS FOR MINTON
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
PROBATE DIVISION
In Re: Estate of Lisa McPherson,
Deceased.
_______________________________/ CASE NO. 97-0589-ES-003
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG
SERVICE ORGAMZATION, INC.,
ADVERSARY PROCEEDING #4
Petitioner/Plaintiff
vs.
DELL LIEBREICH, Individually and as
Personal Representative,
Respondents/Defendant.
__________________________________________________________/
JOINDER OF CREDITOR RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY
CENTER TO PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM
Religious Technology Center ("RTC") a creditor and "interested person"
herewith joins in with Petition for Appointment of Administrator Ad Litem,
("Petition"), filed by the Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization
pursuant to Rule 5.120 Fla. Probate Rules, for the limited purpose of taking
charge of and resolving litigation that is wasting the remaining assets of
the Estate.
1. The Estate is liable for judgments totaling $548,010.87, plus post-
judgment interest for breach of contract in the case entitled, Religious
Technology Center v.
Liebreich, in the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of
Texas, Case No. 6:00 CV503. (Exs. A & B). RTC has also been awarded
$98,296.00 in sanctions against the Estate's counsel for conducting
frivolous and vexatious litigation on behalf of the Estate. (Ex. C). RTC is
accordingly an "interested person" to this action.
2. RTC joins the Petition for Appointment of Administrator Ad Litem for
all the reasons set forth in the Petition.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy hereof has been furnished by facsimile and
regular U.S. mail to
Kennan G. Dandar, Esq., Dandar & Dandar, P.A.,
1715 N. Westshore Blvd., Suite 750, Tampa, FL 33607;
Anthony Battaglia, Esq., Ross, Dicus & Wein, P.A.,
P.O. Box 41100, St. Petersburg, FL 33743-1100;
and William Rambaum, Esq., 28960
U.S. Hwy. 19 North, Suite 100, Clearwater, FL 33761-2403,
this day of September, 2002.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR,
RIYPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
By:
F. Wallace Pope, Jr.
Post Office Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 33757
(727) 461-1818
(727) 441-8617 fax
SPN# 00002797
Attorneys for Religious
Technology Center
275331
From: ptsc <ptsc AT nym DOT cryptofortress DOT com>
Subject: Minton joins Scientology suit against McPherson family
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:05:06 -0400
Organization: ARS: Definitely the Most Malignant Newsgroup on Usenet
Message-ID: <jjnsnu45998l2ntrrrlg2r3rm5b5lp4jnf@4ax.com>
IN THE CIRCUIIT COURT FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA