On 23 Jan 2003 01:54:17 -0500, sure@desinet.net (sure) wrote:

>In article <3e2f8ae1$1@news2.lightlink.com>, res1cpaw@verizon.net wrote...
>>
>>Oh, I guess YOU are the new expert on what Scientology
>>will or won't do. In particular, where the USB checks first
>>surfaced.
>
>When/where did they first "surface" ?

After the hearings started in April in Baird's courtroom, Bob disclosed that he had paid Dandar an additional $750,000 to Dandar which was never reported to the probate court or anywhere else.

Dandar at first refused to acknowledge their existance so Bob had UBS fax the checks to his home which I then faxed down to Clearwater so Bob could enter them into evidence. The bank faxed the front of the two checks.

When confronted with them in Baird's courtroom, Dandar then said, "I don't see my signiture on the back" and therefore refused to acknowledge them again. We had to have the bank re-fax both the front and this time the back as well which I again sent down to Bob in Clearwater.

This took a considerable amount of time and caused a great amount of worry that the faxes would not arrive in time to be used in court. If Scientology had them all along, why wouldn't they have simply given them to Bob who could have "lied for Scientology" and said he had them from the get go?

Also, if Scientology had these checks, what value would they have as blackmail? Presumably, the blackmail would have been along the lines of "You do this for us or we will produce these two checks which show you lied in your testimony about how much you funded the case." But since Bob presented them to the court and himself admitted he lied about this issue, then where's the blackmail?

If these were items being used as blackmail, Bob's "cooperation" would have kept them hidden away instead of being presented into evidence.

At least thats my understanding of blackmail.

By the way, it would be good if all of the testimony from Baird's courtroom would be released.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I'm really disappointed that you're being like this, Jeff. But then again, you have hostile thoughts about me, so we're even."

"But of course, you're so German and you dislike me so much you'd nitpick about anything I did."

--- Deana M. Holmes, the Lucy Van Pelt of a.r.s

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Jesse Prince" <res1cpaw@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Minton car had a BULLET HOLE?
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:08:31 -0500
Message-ID: <3e303dae$1@news2.lightlink.com>

Mark, you are forgetting the sequence.

Stacy and Bob went to New York first, I believe it was in March. This is when Bob called me and told me Rinder told him he had copies of the USB check.

December/January is when Stacy contacted Rinder, and started working out her deal to "get Bob out of it".

Bob started talking with Rinder in March and that's when he started to freak out. Stacy assured Bob all would be well is he just followed her lead.

Remember back in September of 2001, when Stacy was being deposed often? Remember when she revealed the information about the "checks" to Scientology, and Bob started to unravel. Stacy's comment was "Sorry, you know I have a big mouth".

All of this you have written was AFTER the deal was made in New York, so I ask you again, don't believe the hype and don't spread Stacy's disease of the truth.