Mark Bunker and others are putting forth the claim that Minton WAS NOT
blackmailed.
Bunker has said:
> There's a difference between blackmail
That is not what Schaeffer ruled:
(Separated into paragraphs for clarification)
Schaeffer said:
quote:
"The Plaintiff suggests that the Church
extorted and blackmailed Mr. Minton
and Stacy Brooks to say they had lied
when they hadn't, or to say Dandar caused them to lie.
"It isn't necessary for this court to resolve this issue, since there
has been no Motion filed against the Church to dismiss or strike its
answer or counterclaim, or any disqualification motion to dismiss its
attorneys. I hope there will be none.
"However, to assist the state attorney, who will receive a copy of this
Order, the main witness the state may have to rely on to prove
extortion/blackmail is Jesse Prince. His extreme bias against the Church
has been discussed by this court on numerous occasions. I find his
credibility, based on his previous testimony, and the testimony before
me at the Omnibus Hearing, to be suspect.
"Based on being an admitted perjurer, and the testimony presented before
me at the Omnibus Hearing, the credibility of Ms. Brooks is flawed. Mr.
Minton has very little credibility based on his testimony before me,
especially if he needs to lie for his own good, or his money.
"Ms. Monique Yingling, the only other witness who testified before me,
and who might know the truth about any blackmail and extortion is a
noted member of both the California and D.C. Bar. I found her testimony
to be quite credible, and do not believe for a moment she would
jeopardize her license to practice law by lying, committing extortion,
blackmail, or allowing anyone in her presence to do so.
"Neither, Mr. Rosen, nor Mr. Rinder testified before me, so I have no
basis to judge their credibility. However, if Mr. Rinder has done what
has been attributed to him, including offering money for perjured
affidavits, his credibility is certainly suspect.
"Perhaps after I have had the opportunity to work with Mr. Rosen, who
has recently become the Church's chief trial counsel, I will have an
opportunity to personally assess his credibility. I will note, however,
that when I inquired, pursuant to his Motion to be admitted pro hac vice
in the wrongful death case, I heard nothing from other judges who had
worked with him on cases before them which would suggest that he would
be involved in such scurrilous activity.
"This is all I intend to say in this Order about extortion or
blackmail."(unquote)
Schaeffer did not rule there was no blackmail. She is not addressing
the issue because no motion has been filed. She ruled that Minton's
testimony, was not relevant to the trying of wrongful death suit.
But she is referring the matter to the proper authorities and if a
motion is filed, it will have to be addressed. I hope she hasn't
forgotten that Rosen lied in Baird's Court when he (Rosen) said she
(Schaeffer) said something she didn't say about the value of the
wrongful death suit.
I hope Schaeffer hasn't also overlooked the fact, that Attorney
Yingling, who took lots of notes at the first meeting and took notes in
court, did not (or claims she did not) take one single note at the
following 10-12 meetings with Minton and Brooks without their attorney.
I find it hard to believe that a "reputaable" attorney would meet with
opponents without their attorney being present. I hope Judge Schaeller
doesn't forget that the Estate had a hell of a time to get COS lawyers
to turn over Yingling's notes and probably only did so because Stephen
JONAS, Minton's attorney, was present and knew she (Yingling) took
notes.
>There was, however, a
There was aslo a MAJOR campaign to destroy the wrongful death suit and
the COS used Minton's footbullets in an effort to accomplish that goal.
So who thinks Minton was blackmailed into helping the COS, among several
things, make the wrongful death suit "go away"?
Tigger
These, as they are often used, are but three different names for
hypocrisy, chicanery, and cowardice." -- John Adams
**************************************************************
From: boobootigger@webtv.net (Tigger)
Subject: Was MINTON or Was MINTON Not BLACKMAILED?
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:57:20 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <877-3E37F9E0-33@storefull-2276.public.lawson.webtv.net>
> and considerable pressure. Schaeffer
> herself has ruled there was no
> blackmail.
> global campaign to destroy Bob for all
> the good deeds he did for people.
> Meeting with Rinder was to handle that
> assault.
**************************************************************
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the
people... Be not intimidated, therefore, by any terrors, from publishing
with the utmost freedom...nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of
your liberty by any pretenses of politeness, delicacy, or decency.