Hi,
The following is a post I did on a private list, in response to questions regarding sec checking.
I thought it might be of interest to some here, lurkers or not.
Virginia
---------------------
Confront,
Want to know how LRH says to keep espionage from occurring? (the big reason RTC "does" sec checks). Clue: NO WHERE IN THIS REFERENCE DOES IT SAY SEC CHECKING IS THE TOOL TO USE.
from HCOPL 1 September 1969R Revised 24 September 1983 COUNTERESPIONAGE
section "ORG'S PROTECTION"
"Our Dianetics and Scientology orgs are fortunate in that where tech is "in" very little infiltration can occur since persons cannot benefit from things they try to harm.
Our primary protection is "in" tech and well processed staffs. It follows that when tech is out, ethics will be found out also."
So there you go, in tech and well processed staffs is the answer, something which RTC cannot seem to grasp.
As another investigatory point, now that I read this again after everything I now know, look what LRH says are signs of intelligence actions being done on the organization, and see if any of these look familiar to you.
"Intelligence actions internally in a company or organization take five main courses:
1. Theft of documents or materials.
2. Executive actions contrary to the company's best interests, if not out-right destructive.
3. Administrative enturbulation, including messing up files, addresses, facilities or communications.
4. False reports or false advices to customers or staff to bring about apathy or defeatism.
5. Perversion or corruption of the product (in our case, technology)."
Hmmm, looks like we have at a minimum nbr 2, 3, 4, and 5, present in the current Church of Scientology. Especially 2 and 5. One is probably present as well, if we investigate for it.
What does LRH say the motive is for all this?
"Financial gain is the primary motive in almost all cases of infiltration."
Now who would be gaining financially off of this infiltration, it's certainly not the staff. Let's see, what about the special directors of CST, or David Miscaviage, Norman Starkey, Marty Rathbun, or Mike Rinder?
Somebody is getting the money, as that IS the primary motivation for the current infiltration of the Church, per LRH.
Let's investigate that some more, shall we?
How about a "noisy" investigation into where the money is going?
Virginia
