From: martinottmann@yahoo.com (Martin Ottmann)

Subject: CMO Int Eval Order - April 18th, 1984

Date: 18 Jan 2003 11:33:12 -0800

Message-ID: <71d327bb.0301181133.401829a3@posting.google.com>


[This document mentions our Barbara Schwarz]

SEA ORGANIZATION

18 April 1984

CMO INT EVAL ORDER __

EU ORGS

EU AFFLUENCE EVAL
SITUATION ONE

POLICY: "NOTHING IN THIS EVAL MAY BE INTERPRETED TO VIOLATE OR ALTER
OR CHANGE OR CHANGE HCO PLs OR HCOBS. ANYONE EXECUTING A TARGET ON
THIS EVAL IN SUCH A WAY AS TO VIOLATE ANY HCOPL OR HCOB WILL BE
ACTIONABLE BY COMM EV. ANY RECOMMENDATION IN THIS EVAL OR CHANGE OF
POLICY OR TECH MUST BE CLEARED BY THE WATCHDOG COMMITTEE (WDC) BEFORE
BEING PLACED IN THE EVAL AS A TARGET AND RESULTING PL OR BULLETIN MUST
BE REVIEWED BY THE FOUNDER PERSONALLY. ALL DATA OR HANDLINGS WHERE
THEY REFER TO POLICY OR BULLETINS MUST GIVE THE POLICY OR BULLETIN
NUMBER AND ITS LOCATION AND TEXT VERBATIM" LRH (HCO PL 26.12.79
EXECUTION OF EVALUATIONS)

"WDC ED 86-3 "IMPORTANT INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC PLANNING"
"The Strategy as such is 'TO CONTINUE PRODUCTION AS POSSIBLE UNTIL IT
RUNS INTO BLOCKS AND HANDLE THESE WITH ETHICS AND GET PRODUCTION GOING
AGAIN WHILE REFORMING NEW MANAGEMENT LINES.'"

HCOB 1 May 58 'SIGNS OF SUCCES'

HCO MANUAL OF JUSTICE

LRH ED 22 WW 12 Feb 70 "I have been saying to various people for about
5 months you have been infiltrated. This means people have been put in
on your lines."

"A whole network or orgs cannot by itself disintegrate in only a year
and a half. It needs a lot or help. Foolishness and mistakes account
for some of it. But out ethics is present as the big factor."

LRH ED 339R

HCO PL 13 Jan 83 "THE BUSINESS OF ORGS"

HCO PL 11 May 65 "ETHICS OFFICER HAT"

SITUATION ONE: DESPITE CONCENTRATED HANDLING OF EU TO GET THEM OUT OF
ENEMY HANDS AND EXPANDING, EU IS NO LONGER UNDER CONTROL AND WON'T
RESPOND.

STATS: Cont stats go into affluence from March to June 83 and again
starting in Oct 83.

While sales has been in normal orgs are refusing to call in and
deliver. Refund Requests and CVB very high. The key call in and
delivery stats falter in Dec/Jan 83 and go into danger in Feb 84.
Sales has now crashed as of 3 weekz ago.

Examination of the key orgs in the Cont shows these orgs crashing from
Dec 83 or Jan 84 and none recovering in PT. Recent stat corrections
from Milano and a scene very out of control.

DATA: EU Cont went into affluence from March to June 83 coincident
with a Int Mission. The mission was sent in after a full study of the
FOLO per the advices in this policy section and found a major external
influence in the form of ex-GO members smashing the Cont to bits.

This mission was sent in to handle the FOLO and slam in WDC ED 86-3
"TO CONTINUE PRODUCTION AS POSSIBLE UNTIL IT RUNS INTO BLOCKS AND
HANDLE THESE WITH ETHICS AND GET PRODUCTClN GOING AGAIN WHILE
REFORMING NEW MANAGAMENT LINES." This mission got the FOLO to demand
production and get the orgs listening to the FOLO management. The
mission heavily worked on this Strategy and put in ethics where no
response to the mission actions. EDs who were not responding despite
standard actions were pulled to the FOLO and meter checked for
disaffection. Whatever these EDs were sitting on causing them to not
listed to the FOLO and expand their orgs was uncovered and handled.
Depending on the EDs response they were sent back after clean up or
replaced. It was a very snap and pop no Q and A application of the
Strategy. COs/EDs themselves were hatted fully on the Int Strategy and
ordered to apply it to their orgs.

Concurrent with this mission a separate external influences handling
mission was fired in that handled the key terminals who were
supressing the FOLO and orgs and got them off the lines. Another
separate mission was fired to disband and handle the GO.

At the start of the Oct 83 Affluence a new mission is sent into FLEU
duplicating this successful strategy and stats again go into
affluence. With the Strategy being applied in full and the FOLO also
training up for every single org, RBers and meter checkers who went
back to their areas and also applied this tech to knock out external
influences and keep the orgs proofed and productive. There was vv
[sic] heavy production demand and ethics was slammed in hard.
Concurrent with this mission is a separate mission being run by RTC to
handle the squirrels as external influences. (CORRECTLY INCLUDED USE
OF ETHICS AND APPLICATION OF THE INT STRATEGY - ALESSO/WEST MISSION,
TOMMY G. MISSION, 83 EXT INFLUENCE AND GO DISBAND MISSION, RTC
SQUIRREL HANDLING MISSION; CORRECT TGT -LRH)

The strategy was recently found wildly out with many enemy lines being
run on how the Strategy couldn't be applied. (CONTRARY FACTS - EU)

Examining what cut across the mission actions each time found: In June
when EU falters after the mission had pulled out it was found that the
mission actions had been cut across by rumours that the strategy was
wrong. The FOLO was no longer using the Strategy. The orgs were laid
open to enemy prey and EU crashes.

An eval then done in Sept 83 removes the CO EU and the FOLO informs
all its orgs that the Int Strategy is cancelled, the FOLO wouldn't be
doing that anymore and that the CO EU would never return.

Out ethics and external influences moved in on the lines. (WRONG
TARGET - THOSE ABOVE)

In late Dec just prior to the second mission pulling out a key change
occurs. On 18 Dec a mission fires into EU and while the mission had
the purpose of handling the sit of feeding the oppossition [sic] by
handling outstanding justice action, this mission sent a mult down the
lines on 22 Dec 83 that was posted in all orgs and that included in
its announcement that since the Church was in affluence ethics was
light. This as written acted as in conflict with the Strategy being
pushed and threw in confusions to WDC ED 86-3 as the Strategy (ADDED
INAPPLICABLE, INCORRORRECTLY [sic] INCLUDEDS - 22 DEC MULT)

At the same time some uncoordinated actions were taken in the lifting
of declares on some major and key SPs found by the early 83 missions
and external influence missions, who were declared and gotten off the
lines loudly. These include infamous SPs such examples as THOMAS
NORDLUND who set up his own org near STM org in 82, and who is
connected to squirrel TODDE SALEM. LENA FORSMAN who was a complete
destructive SP and was undeclared and now helps out in the business of
JAN ADERSON in GOT who is disaffected an about management heavily
[sic]. And NIELS OLAF STROM ex-AG who is on lines to get back in good
standing, BERT SCHWITTERS ex-AG and heavy SP who ran anti org lines on
the org was undeclared. And ULI BÜHLER formerly working as a lawyer
for MUN GO who has been put back on the lines in MUN coincident with
its crash in Dec 83.

The Ethics orders that lifted these declares widely and were
distributed to the Cont in late Dec 83 just before the last mission
terminates. These Ethics Orders were issued and written in a way as 
to make these guys look vv [sic] good. This tended to confirm that the
earlier Strategy (as above) was wrong and changed and the Cont itself
went into confusion on their former actions and there was much upset
on the lines as this crossed the Int Strategy that had just been
reimplemented. All of the above people are still on lines.
(INCORRECTLY INCLUDEDS, WRONG TARGETS - THOSE CONSERNED [sic])

In Jan 84 10 more squirrel groups formed in EU and the lines on
squirrels got very heavy. This is coincident with the lax in the
Strategy and there was no longer anyone monitoring external influences
with key SPs back on the lines. (ADDED INAPFLICABLES, OMITTED USE OF
THE STRATEGY - EU)

In Feb 84 a heavy push begins on SAC lines in key areas of MUN, Paris
and France on handling Refund Requests. While it is valid these get
handled and there is a valid situation actions are being ordered in on
a bypass of NCCs and there is franticness [sic] on the lines.

In Munich the SAC I/C since removed BARBARA SCHWARTZ [sic], ex-GO put
a lot of enturbulation on the org lines and forced down the org's
bodyrouting lines. (ADDED INAPPLICABLE, WRONG TGT - THOSE ABOVE;
OMITTED HANDLINGS AND USE OF STRATEGY)

There is evidence of very definate [sic] confusion in EU that the Int
Strategy per WDC ED 86-3 has been cancelled and we now have a 'new
strategy'. (ADDED INAPPLICABLE CONFUSIONS - INT MGMT, EU)

WHY: THE ORIGINAL SUCCESSFUL EXTERNAL INFLUENCE HANDLINGS FOR EU CONT
AS PER THE FEB 83 EU EVAL, WERE CAREFULLY UNDONE WITH THE EXTERNAL
INFLUENCES PUT BACK ON THE LINES WHILE AT THE SAME TIME CONFUSING THE
INT STRATEGY PER WDC ED 86-3 TO THE POINT IT WAS NO LONGER KNOWN, AND
COULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD OR USED.

ETHICS WHY: SABOTAGE OF SUCCESSFUL INT STRATEGY DUE TO EVIL PURPOSES
AND INTENTIONS.

WHOS: EXTERNAL INFLUENCES AND EX-GO BACK ON LINES AS PER DATA TRAIL,
EU EXECS WHO WENT EFFECT DUE TO THEIR OWN OUT ETHICS AND EVIL
PURPOSES.

IDEAL SCENE: EXPANDING AND PROSPEROUS EU ORGS FREE OF ENEMY INFLUENCES
AND INFILTRATION THRU A VERY STRICT APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
STRATEGY.

CMO INT EVALUATOR

CR:rd