From: martinottmann@yahoo.com (Martin Ottmann)

Subject: Kember's 1967 comments on "The Process"

Date: 11 Jan 2003 13:53:12 -0800

Message-ID: <71d327bb.0301111353.78d1e9f1@posting.google.com>


HUBBARD COLLEGE OF SCIENTOLOGY

Saint Hill Manor
East Grinstead
Sussex, Grinstead

26 May 1967

411 West Green Road
Tottenham
London

Dear George,

Thank you for sending me the Process magazine. I attach the comments
on the whole magazine from our Magazine Branch, and I would like to
point out that theta communicates - not entheta. Also the layout is
confusing, and has a spinny effect. I do not agree that the quality is
good - in fact, i think it is unbelievable bad.

A certain section of the public might be restimulated by the garbage
in this magazine, and might, if it could follow the thread, go in and
see the Process people, but I doubt if it would have any major appeal.
It's too confused, and presents too many conflicting subjects and
choices. Also - it's too tawdrily sensational.

I do not expect you to pursue the subject as this is an SP group, and
I thank you for your ideas.

With ARC,

[Signature]
Jane Kember
Public Relations Officer