From: martinottmann@yahoo.com (Martin Ottmann)

Subject: The Story of a Squirrel: David Mayo

Date: 13 Jan 2003 15:51:47 -0800

Message-ID: <71d327bb.0301131551.546cee69@posting.google.com>


(Blue Ink on Blue Paper)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

SO ED 2344 INT
20 August 1983

BPI
All Scientologists
All Orgs and Missions
Field Auditors
Field Groups



THE STORY OF A SQUIRREL: DAVID MAYO



Form time to time briefings are issued to Scientology staff and public
so they can keep abreast of what is going on in the Church - whether
it concerns a new Org or Mission being opened in some country, an LRH
book being translated into a new language, or some milestone in the
crusade to get basic LRH standard tech being applied (and squirrel
practices stamped out).

This is a briefing on a squirrel named David Mayo.

The following data is being released to you, as staff member or public
in Scientology, you should be kept informed of such things and the
actual facts made available to you.

Mayo was simply a bird dog. The definition of a bird dog is: "Somebody
sent in by an enemy to mess things up." (LRH)

"The actual situation is that you had a bird dog right in the middle
of the control room: David Mayo. He was sabotaging execs by wrecking
their cases. Non of this was by accident or incompetence. Of all the
crazy, cock-eyed sabotage I've ever seen, man, he was at it. He was
not doing Dn and Scn. He was just calling it that and using the
patter. His obvious intention was to wreck all cases of persons who
could help others." (LRH)

Betrayals like this are not new. Groups and organizations had to
contend with covert attacks such as this since ancient times. And over
the past 33 years our group has weathered its share of those who
sought to infiltrate and sabotage our activities, gaining positions
within the Church through deception in order to halt the expansion of
Scientology or disrupt its organizational structure.

There is a long rouster of such persons, including Edgar Watson, Jack
Horner, Harry Thompson, Werner Erhardt, Bob Miles, Alan Walter, Bernie
Green and others of that ilk. All of them are squirrels, all of them
are suppressives. And all of them were, of course, caught.

DETECTION

With Mayo, the first clue to what he was up to was when he broadly
published a misdefinition of the State of Clear. A cramming order was
issued at the time, but instead of simply doing the cram, he claimed
motivators:

"Mayo was the boy they were relying on. He is a very clever fellow in
that he could lie to me consistently, convincingly report, this that
or the other thing. He actually came a cropper when tow of the most
banal technical actions you ever hears of (the first one was a
cramming order, clearing the word 'Clear' as per Book One and the
second was taking a car down a road) 'caved in his case' and caused
him to have an accident and break his finger. This is the symptom of a
mental reaction of trying to make somebody else wrong. The truth of
the matter is that these actions were about as strong as a drink of
milk and couldn't possibly have done anything to anybody. He directly
lied and was found to be squirreling the simpliest process there ever
was. He also false reported the actions of a pc on [the process] and
how the program was run on her. It was this last straw which broke the
camel's back." (LRH)

Despite his cleverness at lying and manufacturing convincing reports,
there were indicators which gave him away.

One of these is that over a period of time he became increasingly
critical of other people - auditors, C/Ses, public pcs, staff pcs,
public students, tech staff, admin staff, his seniors, his juniors,
celebrities, businessmen who applied Scientology tech, executives, Sea
Org staff, Mission staff, field auditors, respected people in a
variety of prefessions (both in and out of Scientology) and,
especially, Ethics Officers.

This built up to a point where staff members around him had only to
start really looking at what he was so busy accusing others of to find
the clues to what he himself was up to (see HCOB 15 Sep 81, THE
CRIMINAL MIND).

MIXING RUNDOWNS

A pc folder that Mayo had been personally C/Sing was reviewed. This
case had been run on Post Purpose Clearing by an auditor and was VGIs.
Mayo then got hold of the folder and intentionally C/Sed to mix an
Expanded Dianetics action into the program to make the pc think that
his (the pc's) post purpose was an "evil purpose". Concerning this
pc's Post Purpose Clearing:

"To cross it with Expanded Dianetics was inexusably malicious." (LRH)

Probably the last thing Mayo expected was that a Class 4 auditor would
find this out tech or, upon finding it, would report it. Fortunately
the auditor did report it, applying the HCO PL 22 July 82 KNOWLEDGE
REPORTS, to keep Scientology working. LRH then called for more pc
folders that Mayo had been C/Sing and more of the same hideous
squirreling was found. The actions he had taken on these cases were
not "errors". What he'd been doing was deliberately misprogramming and
mis-C/Sing the cases of executives in the areas he worked in to try to
cave them in and make them think that Scn "didn't work". Concerning
this one particular matter:

"[It was] as SP use of tech, selectively caving people in." (LRH)

This same type of thing was found in quite a few folders that he had
been "C/Sing", and a number of these are described in the HCOB of 28
Sept 82, C/S Series 115, MIXING RUNDOWNS & REPAIRS, written by LRH to
correct severe out tech that had been committed (and foisted off on
tech staff) by Mayo. The following is from that HCOB:

"WHEN C/SING A RUNDOWN ONE C/SES THAT RUNDOWN, NOT A MIXTURE OF
DIFFERENT RUNDOWNS. EACH RUNDOWN IS ITSELF AND NO OTHER, AND EACH
RUNDOWN HAS ITS OWN REPAIR.

"To do otherwise is violent and actionable out-tech.

"EXAMPLES OF MIXED RUNDOWNS AND REPAIRS
"Recently one particular (now removed) C/S was found to have an
'anything goes' pattern of C/Sing and programming cases. This C/S
mixed rundowns one with another into hash and did not do the standard
rundown or repair it standardly as its own rundown."

... "RULE FOUR: ALWAYS C/S the pc for his own gain, not for any other
purpose. The purpose of auditing is to help the pc, not to remedy
social or organizational ills. If this is followed, those same ills
vanish. If this is not followed, the ills multiplied. The purpose of
auditing is to help the pc become more able as a being and has no part
in discipline or 'getting even'." (LRH)

TORPEDOING OF A QUAL DIVISION

Mayo directly supervised the delivery and tech quality of a Qual Div
in the area he worked in, which was responsible for the auditing and
enhancement of some 200 staff.

By actual survey of their pc folders, these staff had made little or
no progress up the Bridge for a period of 3 1/2 years - the time
period that Mayo was over the area. The following stable datum was
given by LRH on this:

"A SENIOR C/S IS KNOWN BY HIS NEAREST QUAL." (LRH)

The cases of these staff had been mis-programmed; the auditors had
mostly either given up auditing or had been blown off the lines, and
those that remained in the Qual Div were found to be running squirrel
"pilot" and "repair" processes that had been invented and C/Sed by
Mayo.

SABOTAGE OF ETHICS TECHNOLOGY

It was found that Mayo had worked industriously and by various means
to make the subject of Scientology Ethics and Justice totally
confusing for other Scientologists, hoping to make this LRH technology
appear to be unworkable (and thereby ever further foul up people's
progress up the Bridge.) For example, May put out falsely signed
issues and communications that conflicted one with the other - such as
on the one hand ordering or advising from his post incorrect or
overly-harsh ethics actions on certain staff and public, and on the
other hand issuing material generally instructing staff to NOT use
ethics. It took some doing to get this straightened out and get this
off-Source despatches, issues and verbal tech traced down and off the
lines.

An HCOB was written by LRH entitled ETHICS AND THE C/S, HCOB 13 Oct
82, C/S Series 116. Mayo is the "C/S" described in the opening two
pararaphs of this HCOB:

"It has just been brought to my attention that over the last few years
a C/S had been advising staffs that C/S approval was required before
somebody could be handled in Ethics!

"(The real problem that he was solving was that he had an out ethics
situation of his own going on, and didn't want an Ethics Officer
anywhere around. He has since been removed from post.)" (LRH)

"Mayo had a very interesting criminal trick going here: He was
pretending that he had discovered that sec checking and ethics were
out when as a matter of fact he was only covering his tracks: He was
the one who threw it out. And when [later someone was] requiring some
sec checking, I suppose in a panic he 'discovered' that ethics had not
been used for a long time. He was the one who had pushed it out."
(LRH)

ATTEMPT TO WRECK AUDITOR TRAINING

Additionally it was found that Mayo had tried to sabotage the training
side of the Bridge by removing the Professional TRs as prerequisite to
professional auditor training, and issuing policy stating that
auditors were not to do their TR training until after Class IV:

"That blank Mayo and company cancelled out the Pro TR Course as
requisite to a professional auditor."

"This hits squarely at the most fundamental thing in auditing that you
could hit at: The TR course." (LRH)

"In other words, this Pro TRs Course was a key point which was
carefully and cleverly removed."

"Mayo could not have done a more vicious thing than that." (LRH)

"The main discovery was that Mayo had very carefully eradicated TRs.
Thinking it over, I would say that Mayo is a covert NCG (No Case
Gain), for if he were ever audited by somebody whose TRs were out, not
even his suppressive curves would permit him to make such a horror of
a scene."

"I notice that Mr. SP Mayo, the darling of the psychs, rewrote HCOB
TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED. In a case of this character, you would
expect to find sneakers of one sort or another, little curves that
would turn up later to wreck things."

"What happened here in this mess Mayo created - and very artfully I
might add - was that he involved basic policy with simply tactical
considerations and altered basic policy and then tangled up the rest
of it as well. It is typical of criminals that they can make a
championship mess that is difficult to untangle." (LRH)

Nevertheless it was untangled, and Mayo's issue (PL of 13 Sept 81,
ACADEMY LEVELS PREREQUISITES) has been cancelled along with the other
write ups that he'd put out on this subject, by HCO PL 8 Aug 83,
CANCELLATION OF ISSUES ON TRs. And the correct placement of the Pro
TRs Course has been restored with the issuance of HCO PL 23 Jan 83,
URGENT - IMPORTANT, AUDITOR TRAINING PREREQUISITE. Also the HCOB
TRAINING DRILLS REMODERNIZED as last revised by LRH himself in 1978,
has been reissued replacing and cancelling the altered version that
Mayo had put out.

DESTRUCTIVE "KSW" ISSUES BY MAYO

It was discovered May had authored a batch of squirrel issues in 1980
and 81 consisting of grossly twisted interpretations of the tech, very
misleading labelled "Keeping Scientology Working" issues. These are
described in the HCOB of 11 April 83, CANCELLATION OF DESTRUCTIVE
ISSUES, by LRH, which cancelled the lot. (And, not surprisingly, there
was a sharp rise in delivery stats internationally right after these
issues were cancelled.)

MEGALOMANIA

Instead of carrying out his post duties, May spent a large part of his
time working out various ways to communicate to staffs and public the
idea that he was "Source" - an idea that he had entertained for some
time and still does to this day - whether by getting his name in
print, his face featured in promotional pieces or other means.
Recently, for example, May had such delusions of himself as being the
"Source of tech" that he was negotiating with a dwindling squirrel
group (Riverside, California) to sell them the rights to promote their
tech as "Mayo tech" instead of "L. Ron Hubbard's tech".

He is dramatizing (defined in the Tech Dictionary as "a person who has
delusions of grandeur, wealth, power, etc.").

He was trying to set himself up as someone whom others would look to
for interpretation of Scientology tech materials, rather than working
at getting actual Scientology tech applied by others exactly as
written in Source materials.

"The apparancy is somebody's pretence to know from me more than is on
the tapes and in books and mimeos, or, brutally, somebody's alter-is
of materials. This looks like a 'hidden data line'. It surely isn't."
(LRH, from HCO PL 16 Apr 65, THE "HIDDEN DATA LINE"

FURTHER DATA

The above data has been made available to give some idea of what this
person was up to. It is not by any means a full and complete account
of all his destructive actions.

There are other HCOBs and HCO PLs written during the past year that
give further information on what Mayo did and the actions that have
been taken to handle these messes. These include HCO PL 29 Sep 82,
MISREPRESENTATION OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY and the HCO PL of 12
Oct, CORRUPT ACTIVITIES.

PURPOSE

Mayo's hat when he was in the employ of the Church was to safeguard
and ensure standard application of the tech, and to assist in
compilations of LRH technical materials; NOT assume the hat of Source.
His expressed intention was to "take over" the hat of the SOURCE of
Scientology and Dianetics tech. Such a concept is so outrageous and
ridiculous it defies comment.

Beneath that was purpose to block the flow of people moving up the
Bridge and onto upper levels. The actions that he took to carry out
this purpose were not accidental; they were deliberate.

"Insanity" is defined in HCOB 28 Nov 70, C/S Series 22, PSYCHOSIS
(Tech Volume X, page 72). Per this HCOB:

"INSANITY IS THE OVERT OR COVERT BUT ALWAYS COMPLEX AND CONTINUOUS
DETERMINATION TO HARM OR DESTROY.

" Possibly the only frightening thing about it is the cleverness with
which it can be hidden." (LRH)

"Mayo is a very clever cat. Although he did not succeed in the long
run in fooling me could nevertheless put up a pretty good show. This
means that he is a very clever fellow. He showed one face in one
direction and quite another face in another direction." (LRH)

Further on this same point:

"The out tech scene perpetrated by Mayo adds up to a very cunning
attempt to block the flow of people up the Bridge. Some people have a
horror of anyone getting more powerful than they and people with an
unsavory past on the whole track, can become panic stricken. What we
have here is a person who faced in one direction with all kinds of
reassurances and false reports to coverup his tracks, while, in the
other direction total planned destruction was going forward. This
definitely raises the point with Mayo that his own grades are as false
as a confederate three dollar bill. One is not likely to benefit from
something he is seeking to destroy." (LRH)

And insanity has nothing to do with competence or how smart one is:

"A true psychotic can be brilliant or stupid, competent or
incompetent. It is his general motive or purpose that determines
whether or not he is insane or sane.

"Famous psychotics like Napoleon, Ivan the Terrible, Stalin and Hitler
were all quite brilliant yet wound up destroying everything in sight
including their own people.

"They had a destructive basic purpose. Every psychotic has one. It is
usually covert, hidden, but in full play against his unsuspecting
friends.

"The sole difference in motive is whether it is destructive or
constructive." (LRH, from HCOB 9 May 1977, Issue II, PSYCHOSIS, MORE
ABOUT, Tech Volume XI, p. 313)

SUPPRESSIVE ACTS

Suppressive Acts are those which are "calculated to impede or destroy
Scientology or a Scientologist" and "actions or omissions undertaken
to knowingly suppress, reduce or impede Scientology or
Scientologists."

The following are some of the Suppressive Acts committed by Mayo,
listed here for your information.

Falsely attributing or falsely representing oneself or others as
Source of Scientology or Dianetics technology; or using any position
gained with staff and/or public to falsely attribute non-Source
material to Source or to falsely represent non-Source material as
authorized Scientology or Dianetics technology.

(Spread lies that he had "invented" various Scientology processes
which were in truth developed entirely and completely by Source, not
by Mayo; wrote squirrel programs in pc folders [this was while he was
holding a staff position] and sent these to certain orgs, telling the
C/Ses at these orgs that the programs and rundowns were from Source,
when they were not - they were completely manufactured by Mayo by
illegally taking bits or one rundown and bits of many other rundowns
and mushing them together [results in restimulating different areas
all at once without completing the handling of anything and can make a
pc think that auditing doesn't work]; and many other incidents similar
in nature to the above, intended to make others think that he was "so
close to Source that he must be Source", and gradually bring about
circumstances which [he hoped] would culminate in his being able to
"take over" this hat altogether and "rule" all of Scientology
internationally via tech lines.)

Falsifying records.

(Blatantly false reported to a senior C/S concerning the processes
that certain pcs were being run on; falsified worksheets in pc
folders; placed fabricated case data reports inside of staff members'
pc folders in order to lend credence to out-tech programs that he'd
written and put in their folders; made up communications from a senior
that never existed and were not written by that person; falsely
claimed and received bonuses for "handling public cases", when in
actual fact he misprogrammed them for processes of his own invention
and/or an illegal mixture or pieces of different standard rundowns,
and other tech personnel had then to repair each of these cases.)

Organizing a splinter group to use Scientology data or any part of it
to distract people from standard Scientology.

 (Promoted using Scientology tech when he has no permission whatsoever
to use any of the trademarks or service marks of Scientology applied
religious philosophy in the first place, and has already demonstrated
that his intentions with regard to Scientology are destructive in that
he seeks to use pieces of the tech to tangle up people's cases and
confuse people as to the actual Source of Scientology tech, and puts
out his own interpretations of the tech with the result of distracting
people from Scientology; the group that he has helped to organize to
deliver his version of the tech, sent out promotional type material to
persons known to be on the communication lines of Scientology Churches
and Missions, advertising other practices to distract them from
Scientology.)

Organizing splinter groups to diverge from Scientology practices still
calling it Scientology or calling it something else.

(See above.)

Unauthorized use of the materials of Dianetics and Scientology.

(See above.)

Testifying or giving data against Scientology falsely or in
generalities or without personal knowledge of the matters to which one
testifies.

(Spread falsehoods about Church of Scientology activities and
personnel, including matters he actually does not have any personal
knowledge of but is pretending to; gave out generalities against
Scientology including falsely attributing the Source of Scientology
technology to himself when in actual fact he is not the Source of any
Scientology technology whatsoever. Such a claim is so absurd that it
alone shows just how far south he really is.

Using Scientology (or perverted and alter-ised tech and calling it
Scientology) harmfully so as to bring about disrepute to an org, group
or Scientology itself.

(Ran a Qual Bureau which was found to be committing gross auditing
errors and running squirrel procedures under his direct supervision,
and when asked to correct the out tech, refused to do so; sanctioned
[in writing] the squirrel procedures that Kingsley Wimbush had
invented, which were admittedly an alteration of standard PTS handling
tech, "authorizing" Wimbush's use of these squirrel processes in
Scientology Missions when he [Mayo] had not in fact been granted any
such power to "authorize new tech"; released two issues
internationally which falsely labelled any use of Scientology Ethics
technology as "inval" and "eval" and "not to be done on preclears",
and also claimed that this was based on Source materials; directed a
number of persons to be put onto an upper OT level whose cases were
not yet prepared for a higher Grade or OT level as per standard tech;
Mayo programmed and C/Sed his own folder (unthinkable per standard
tech) for a squirrel "rundown" that he had made up - and ordered the
auditor, Julie Gillespie [now Julie Mayo], to "audit" on him -
consisting of making a list of the persons he most hated, assessing
the list, nattering to the auditor about each person whose name read,
and then arranging to have his pc folder sent to the persons on the
list for them to see what was written in it, all for the admitted
purpose of introverting these persons - not to mention that the
"rundown" mayo devised is completely divorced from anything even
remotely resembling standard tech.)

Acts calculated to misuse, invalidate or alter-is legally or in any
other way the trademarks and service marks of Dianetics and
Scientology.

(Deliberately mis-C/Sed the auditing of his wife, Merrill Mayo, on a
squirrel mixture of Audited NOTs, HRD commands and highly invalidative
processes that May had invented - all done over the top of a heavy
pressing present time problem consisting of the "C/S" [Mayo] telling
the pc between sessions that he planned to marry another staff member,
Julie Gillespie - with the commands of the "processes" that Mayo made
up and C/Sed to be run on the pc and convince the pc that she herself
was the source of this "2nd dynamic problem" - and all during this
time period, which went on for months, Mayo saw to it that the pc
never went to an Examiner after any session, and kept the pc's folder
locked in a file cabinet to ensure that the other tech personnel
around would never see the pc folder or discover what was actually
going on.)

Sexual or sexually perverted conduct contrary to the well being or
good state of mind of a Scientologist in good standing or under the
charge of Scientology such as a student or a preclear.

(Violated the 2nd dynamic rules of the Church staff codes with Julie
Gillespie, while married to Merrill Mayo.)

Issuing alter-ised Scientology technical data or information or
instructional or admin procedures calling it Scientology or calling it
something else to confuse or deceive people as to be true Source,
beliefs and practices of Scientology.

(Issued verbal tech and squirrel instructions to auditors and broadly
published a misdefinition on the State of Clear, causing tech
personnel to think that this was Source data and send pcs who had not
achieved the State of Clear to attest to Clear, thus jamming these
persons' progress up the Bridge; altered several TRs HCOBs so as to
jam the progress of auditor trainees up the Bridge; authored and
falsely signed a C/S Series HCOB [C/S Series 114, since cancelled]
which was a covert alteration of Source material and was intended to
confuse auditors and C/Ses so that they would follow Mayo's
"discoveries" about ethics and neglect Source material on the subject,
thinking that they were following Source material.)

(Note: There are many other crimes which Mayo committed, both while on
staff in the Church and since his departure, which can be read about
in FLAG CONDITIONS ORDER 7138 and in other issues; the above partial
list was included here simply to give an idea of the type and
magnitude of his destructive actions.)

DEPARTURE

Mayo continued this charade all the way up until the moment he was
confronted with the evidence and knew he was caught.

Despite his crimes, extensive (and benevolent) efforts were made to
afford Mayo an opportunity to come straight and correct his wrongs. In
fact, Mayo was on an LRH C/Sed auditing program, which would have
salvaged him as a being, but instead of doing it he chose to blow
before it was completed; and now brags about the fact that he managed
to avoid doing the process honestly, as if avoiding case gain is
something anyone should brag about. Utterly bananas.

"People leave because of their own overts and withholds. That is the
factual fact and the hardbound rule. A man with a clean heart can't be
hurt. The man or woman who must must must become a victim and depart
is departing because of his or her own overts and withholds. It
doesn't matter whether the person is departing from a town or a job or
a session. The cause is the same.

"Almost anyone, no matter his position, can remedy a situation no
matter what's wrong if he or she really wants to. When the person no
longer wants to remedy it (sic!) his own overt acts and withholds
against the others involved in the situation have lowered his own
ability to be responsible for it. Therefore he or she does not remedy
the situation. Departure is the only answer. To justify the departure
the person blowing off dreams up things done to him, in an effort to
minimize the overt by degrading those it was done to. The mechanics
involved are quite simple." (LRH, HCOB 31 Dec AD9, BLOW OFFS)

(Interestingly enough, this very HCOB is one of the LRH issues Mayo
was trying to knock of use.)

Even after his blow, Mayo was again approached. However, he again
refused any offer or mercy or assistance in straightening out his
situation standardly.

CURRENT STATUS

Mayo's current status, as per FLAG CONDITIONS ORDER 7138 of 2 March
83, is DECLARED SUPRRESSIVE PERSON and EXPELLED from the Church of
Scientology.

It has recently come to light that he has joined a group advertising
other practices, teaming up under such persons as Valerie Weiss
Stansfield (a failed auditor whose rip-off of Scientology tech has
consisted of pedding a "Touch for Health" therapy in the Los Angeles
area), Kingsley Wimbush (the person who attempted to re-write LRH PTS
tech and call it "de-dinging") and the "phoenix" squirrel group
members (with their consultant, perennial loser Michael Flynn).

FUTURE

Despite the Church's policy of always trying to "keep the door open a
crack", Mayo has in effect taken the door into his own hands and
welded it shut, airtight. And now that he has accomplished that, he is
trying to seal off any possible future case gain for others.

The facts of the matter are:

(1) Mayo actively worked to BLOCK people from progressing up the
Bridge when he was on a post in the Church that had everything to do
with helping people make it UP the Bridge.

(2) He knows that there are many new OT levels above Solo NOTs which
have been fully researched, and knows that he does NOT have any of the
data on these nor has he ever seen them.

(3) He knows very well that anyone involved in a squirrel group or
psychiatric group or any anti-Scientology activity will never, ever be
permitted to receive these services. He knows that when the Founder
donated the trademarks of Scientology and Dianetics to the Religious
Technology Center, RTC in turn promised to safeguard the tech against
misuse and to make sure that, in accordance with long-standing policy,
the upper levels are kept secure and out of the hands of anyone
intending to use the materials to harm people or for some purpose
other than spiritual gain. (As an aside: Back when the Religious
Technology Center was being formed Mayo tried desperately, on several
occasions, to get himself posted in RTC - he perceived it as a
position of power from which he could wreak even more havoc on tech
lines - but his attempts to gain this posting were unsuccessful. He is
now attacking RTC, as his squirrel practices are diametrically opposed
to the aims and purposes of RTC which are simply to get LRH tech
standardly applied.)

(4) The actions of Mayo and the little group he has joined amount to
not only an attempt to lure some people off the Bridge, but an attempt
to deny that Bridge to them for eternity (because once they become
involved with this squirrel practice they will thereafter be denied
access to the upper levels). And he knows this too. And those who
might fall for his PR should be forewarned.

SUMMARY

David Mayo - Just another bird dog in a long trail of such characters.

They are simply suppressives, and as such they never manage to
actually carry out their evil purposes FULLY as they cannot complete a
cycle of action.

Bird dogs come and go, but we still survive. And we not only survive,
we grow stronger. We learn from such things as this. Despite the
cleverness with which Mayo could lie, he was still found out.

It is a testimony to LRH's refinement of the tech and the streamlining
of the Bridge, with Scientologists becoming more aware and more
perceptive in less time, that we're discovering bird dogs such as this
faster now than ever before and handling fully and utterly exactly as
per the LRH policies on suppressive persons.

A suppressive cannot face up to the tech inherent in the tech nor our
star-high purpose to free our fellow man.

And, as LRH said about a very similar squirrel group in 1965, which is
now defunct:

"They may bring temporary enturbulation to your area but beyond that
have no other importance as such groups die easily and we make a habit
of survival."



Cmdr Ray Mithoff
Snr C/S International

Authorized by
AVC International

for the 

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL