post 10-more comm to april re: KR by wendy

From: "Virginia McClaughry" <>
Subject: post 10-more comm to april re: KR by wendy
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:06:14 -0800
Message-ID: <>

Ethics Ao Sc
-------------- March 23, 1999
Virginia McClaughry

Re: Withdrawal Requests


I had taken a look at my own actions, (per Disputed Ethics Chits), in regards to your report, and Wendy’s.

I want to take up one thing at a time in our communications.

Regarding Wendy, I told her the truth about my cycle, in answer to her questions. The communication was not something that Wendy could experience easily, and Wendy ARC broke. This has occurred before in the past on our FSM/Selectee line, and I had not fully confronted the situation. I realised that I have misestimated the level of truth of communication capable of being experienced easily. I have handled this by ending the FSM/Selectee relationship, and re-looking at what I need and want from an FSM. I will make sure that I communicate clearly to my future FSM my needs and wants, and have that be an agreed upon reality. This will prevent a recurrence of reality and communication breaks.

The fact still remains that Wendy’s reports contain false and altered data, which I do have the right to get corrected.

I request that the withdrawal requests get forwarded, now that I have given you the data on that I had taken a look at my own actions that created an undesirable effect.

Please take a look at this in a new unit of time, and let me know, by fax, what your decision is.

In closing, I have several things that I will be getting in comm with you on in the future, but again, I want to take them up one at a time, this is the first one.

I got your message that you called, and wanted you to know that I received the BOR findings. Before making any final decisions, I need to work this out according to LRH. Meanwhile, to make this easier, I need to complete some cycles, one at a time.

I hope that you will assist me in this.


Virginia McClaughry