Here is what is so blatantly obvious about Co$'s warrant on Gerry, and ~WHY~ they fear his words, and ~WHY~ they want him silenced.
The warrant, from the Co$'s hate site, please read:
http://www.parishioners.org/Intolerance/armst-warrant.html
Gerry is given this warrant, for only ~speaking~ about Co$/LRH/Miscaviage etc.
The fact is, there is nothing that they have issued suing him for defamation or for lying . . .
for one simple reason . . .
he speaks the ~TRUTH~ about them . . .
and it is the ~TRUTH~ that Co$ fears.
Thus, they have spent a fortune in legal fees and lawyers in order to do their best to silence him.
Because . . .
it his the ~TRUTH~ about LRH and them that they fear.
How odd . . .
to be stopped from speaking ~TRUTH~.
Read what Gerry says that the Co$ wants hidden:
http://holysmoke.org/ga/ga.htm
ARC = As-Ising the Real Co$,
Beverly
From: Edmonton Entheta <edmontonentheta@powersurfr.com>
Message-ID: <091220002204084560%edmontonentheta@powersurfr.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 22:04:08 -0800
In article <3A32B818.2B0C@ao.net>, Beverly Rice <dbj1120@ao.net> wrote:
<sniped>
> How odd . . .
>
> to be stopped from speaking ~TRUTH~.
Here's some snippets from a picket in Edmonton in September that Gerry was involved in. Andre is Andre Jurt, a Scientologist for 25+ years, and Deborah Jurt is his wife and the Edmonton DSA. After picketing all day, we could not get any Scientologist to tell us anything that Gerry has done wrong besides speaking about Scientology and haveing a dream about a pig. Wow, what a criminal, eh? The rest of the transcript can be found at: http://www.lermanet.com/misc/edmonton.htm
Andre: I don't talk to an enemy the same way I don't take my son to a child molester for babysitting, ok? I choose not to do that, I choose not to talk to you.
Gerry: And I'm an enemy because your organization designated me an enemy.
Andre: No, it's because of your destructive actions.
Gerry: And what are those destructive actions, do you know any of them? Speaking the truth? Is that a destructive action? Having an opinion? Articulating my opinion? Adhering to the Creed of Scientology?
Andre: As a matter of fact, yes, it is, according to the policy
and ...
Deborah: What's it for?
Gerry: Right, what's the injunction for?
Deborah: Well, you tell me, there's a whole list of things on there.
Gerry: It's for speaking about Scientology.
Deborah: No, that's not it.
Gerry: Well, what's it for then?
Deborah: Well, I'll show it to you later.
Gerry: It's for speaking about Scientology.
Deborah: No, it's for all the things you've done.
Gerry: What have I done?
Deborah: In regards to the court system in California.
Gerry: It's for speaking about Scientology. Imagine, a Church which sues people for speaking ...
Deborah: Have you talked about your pig letter to these people? I'm sure they'd be interested to see that one, Gerry.