post 33: letter to Ed INT

From: "Virginia McClaughry" <vmcc@icehouse.net>
Subject: post 33: letter to Ed INT
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:22:58 -0800
Message-ID: <3a39ab57.0@news2.lightlink.com>

Written approximately january / february 1999


Dear Guillaume,

I hope you get this letter from me because I wanted to tell you I was so happy to hear from you! You are right, it has been years.

I am well, and having a big win on really standing up for LRH and Standard Tech.

However, I have been taken off of Solo Nots, because I want to apply HCOB C/S Series 73RB, and HCOB Confessionals and the NON-Interference Zone.

I have written this up, as well as other reports on out-tech regarding this whole cycle.

Please read the enclosed reports and more recent comm cycles.

I have done the maximum recourse in the Injustice PL, but I will not be allowed back on the level unless I change my viewpoint to that the six month security eligibility check is ok. I would be in Treason to LRH if I did that, and I am not willing to alter tech application in exchange for my OT Levels.

I did request a BOR on my Eligibility suspension, but noone has answered it, so I assume my next action is to request a Comm Ev in the hopes of getting the out-tech situations handled and my name cleared. Please advise if that is the correct next action.

As to your question of “is there anything I would like you to do for me”, the answer is YES!

I need someone to help me get these LRH HCOB’s fully applied as LRH intended.

In case I never told you before, I remember you from the Franks/Gleason time period. I was a telex op in Ext Comm Flag, you were CO Folo EU, and Bridget Kelleher was your Programs off. I will never forget how you stood up for LRH and Standard tech. You used to just say ACK, I only work on REDS EU, whenever anyone would try to tell you to do “their” programs.

Are you still 100 percent LRH?

If so, will you help me get this out-tech corrected?

I await your answer.

Much Love,

Virginia McClaughry